> Well the license specifically says you will not permit a third party to either.
That might as well read as "you can't provide cloud computing" since you can't know what someone is going to execute on their server before they execute it!
That might as well read as "you can't provide cloud computing" since you can't know what someone is going to execute on their server before they execute it!
Comparing arbitrary code execution times on this platform versus another could easily be called 'benchmarking'.
It's just so strange to sell a general purpose processor but then prohibit certain types of code depending on the state of mind of the developer. The same block of code could be permitted or prohibited based on the intent. It's nuts and a legal morass that is hard to imagine any lawyer proposing as a good idea.
Etc etc. This is a legal mess and a strong attack on freedom.