How to Say “I Love You” When the Language Doesn’t Exist
catapult.co
catapult.co
I really connect with this.
In the west, love seems to be this thing you cannot control. It can come upon you suddenly and leave you just as suddenly. In that context, "love" is a scary thing. It seems to have a mind of it's own. Truly, I don't believe that it's love at all, but usually either lust or infatuation in disguise.
I believe whole heartedly that "love" is always an act. You can say you "love" someone while actively doing things that prove you do not love them. Likewise, you can actively show someone love without saying anything to them. True love is a controlled action and is accompanied by feelings (at least at times), but it does not have to be.
Perhaps the Japanese got this completely right.
You can't just say that and then not elaborate :)
Edit: Oops, didn't read the article.
From the article:
In Japanese, the phrase “I love you” exists linguistically, but does not exist culturally. Linguistically, it is best translated as 愛してる or Aishiteru. Unlike English, it does not contain the “I” and “you” involved in “I love you”; instead, the “I” is implicit, belonging to the speaker only in assumption, as is the “you.” The phrase most directly means “(I) am loving (you),” as if to convey that love is an active labor, not just an amorphous feeling tossed between two parties.
This is why we can have song lines like "Are you going to stay with the one who loves you? Or are you going back to the one you love?"
Very often, when someone says "I love you" they mean "I have strong feelings because you are good to me." They don't necessarily mean "So I intend to be good to you."
It's often a pretty parasitic pronouncement.
/cynic
And yes that might make it scary, but that's the reality.
The people in this very discussion pointing out differences and difficulties translating between English and French, Spanish, and (Ancient) Greek should disabuse one of the notion that this is some "Western" thing.
You can translate "I love you" linguistically, but it doesn't really make sense to say - people express it through actions rather than words. It's definitely an interesting (and rather significant) difference in Western culture that grants the 3 words such importance.
Anecdotal, but growing up surrounded by Russians and consuming Russian media daily, "я тебя люблю" as a phrase is something I've heard uttered by others maybe a dozen times, ever, compared to American culture where it's omnipresent and not uncommon to use many times a day.
Movies and books do talk about love, of course, Russian poetry especially expresses love in a truly amazing way. But the article is referring to the frequent conversational use and Western importance of "I love you", and in that sense, there's a major cultural difference. Didn't know about the historical context behind it - that's an interesting point.
and usually the proper way to say it is X のことが好きです which is difficult to translate but it's a subtle nuance referring to the substance of the person instead of just the person.
のことが好きです == "I like that":
https://translate.google.com/#ja/en/%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81...
This would make for a rather unlikely, but interesting, meet-cute.
好き - like
大好き - love (lit. "great fondness")
https://translate.google.com/#ja/en/%E3%81%AE%E3%81%93%E3%81...
and it translates as I love you :) no idea how it would come across in japanese
But it would just never occur to me that adore could be a synonym for love. It just doesn't strike me as such per se.
There are some languages, for example, that have a literal translation of "I love you" but the semantically equivalent expression, when translated to English, is "you are precious to me". It would be awkward to express the English semantics via literal translation, as it has different connotations. The meaning is more important than the literal expression.
The literal translation of "I love you" denotes something closer to "desire" in English.
I was always confused as a kid because the English word "love" is the same translation for various Greek words like ἔρως, ἀγάπη, and φιλία which used to give me conniptions when doing translations in school.
Likewise Sanskrit and modern Hindi make distinctions impossible to differentiate in English (and not just in love -- I speak English with my relatives in India except for words for how people are related to each other, something English doesn't seem to care about at all, as it only has a tiny number of pretty uninformative words like cousin, brother, aunt and so forth. Oh yeah and food words, but that's not English's fault).
By and large English is an OK language, with a moderate-sized vocabulary handily full of loan words, but even though it's the language I've been speaking longest, as I get older I find it less and less expressive. My wife and I used a mélange of three different languages different ones had different ways of expressing certain things we wanted to say to each other.
Thank you for elaborating.
Funnily enough, while "bien" is also positive word, it's indeed used to lessen the power of "aimer". That's the kind of stuff native speakers don't even notice but can confuse everyone else.
I don't think Je t'aime bien its the same as Me gustas and definitely je t'adore doesn't convey the same emotions as te quiero
It's amazing how much language affects how we relate.
Edit: after learning the difference, and because she wasn't ready to say it, even though I was, and not wanting to make her uncomfortable, I invented `te quieramo` as a nice substitute. She seemed to enjoy that :)
If you're talking about something, you would say "mi piace" (as in "mi piace il cioccolato" -> "I like chocolate") unless you really like it, in which case you can as well say "amo il cioccolato" ("I love chocolate") or "adoro il cioccolato" ("I adore(?) chocolate").
-ss
In Klingon, Love would be better expressed through actions.
In this way, Klingon has the same issue as Japanese.