> it is way too expensive for regular gamers
Better cancel my pre-order then...
> 2080Ti likely won't be able to do 4k@60Hz like 1080Ti couldn't either
My 1080ti and 4k monitor beg to differ.
Better cancel my pre-order then...
> 2080Ti likely won't be able to do 4k@60Hz like 1080Ti couldn't either
My 1080ti and 4k monitor beg to differ.
I mean you're not countering his point in any way. He didn't say nobody would buy it, but it's a simple fact that most people can't afford or justify a thousand dollar GPU.
The vast majority of people buying Nvidia GPUs in the 10xx generation were going for 1060s and 1070s.
If you're sufficiently dedicated, even with limited funds going for every second or third iteration of halo products can be a great strategy. That way when you get it you'll have the absolutely best there is and a couple of years down the track it'll still be great but maybe it won't quite do Ultra anymore on the latest titles.
The 1080TI transformed my experience of my X34 Predator (it even paid for itself through timely sale of mining profits) which does 3440x1440 @95hz. I certainly wouldn't mind the new card but I'll wait for the next one after that minimum.
Do people really take out loans to get super expensive video cards?
Sure. Either by putting on a credit card or by using some sort of in store financing.
'most people can't afford or justify'. Come one. People buy cars and other stuff. Someone working fulltime and buying a 1k cheaper car can already afford and justify a 1k graphics card.
Cars do last way more than a video card as well, they have increased warranty period(in the EU video cards have 2y, cars usually 5-7y).
Cars tend to be purchased on leasing due to their higher cost and actual necessity. So saving 1k on a car usually doesn't transfer to 1k in cash.
From those people, it is easily justifyable to spend less on a car, a holiday or rent and instead having a nicer gaming rig. If you spend a lot of time playing games why not?
Modern technology is way cheaper than the previous/old status symbols.
I'm thinking about buying a car and one simple calculation is still what else i can do with that money.
And yes in munich, where i live right now, there are enough people with a car who could use public transport and don't us it.
The target group of a 1k graphics card is not someone who can barely afford the car he/she needs every day and would not be able to earn anything if the car breaks down...
There's also the VR factor, as much as Nvidia/AMD like to label their products "VR ready" we are, imho, ways off from actually being there.
At least if the goal is gonna be something like two displays at 4k@90+Hz and upwards.
my 1070 would do it, but it was garbage fps
For me if its not at 60fps or more ALL the time I'm angry. Grew up playing Quake and Unreal Tournament pretty seriously.
For a more casual game like skyrim it might be fine for me.
The last thing you want is having your field of view obscured by colorful explosions, bloom, debris, etc. when your opponent has a crystal clear vision on you.
But that is a completely orthogonal point to the question as to whether doom runs well at 4k with all features on. Because I am asking that question does not mean I would play death match that way. But I might indeed go through the single player campaign that way.
Indeed I didn't play Doom at 4k at all, because as I said, it felt like garbage at 4k, no matter what settings, on 1070