Archaeologists explore a rural field in Kansas, and a lost city emerges
latimes.com
latimes.com
*edit typo
I don't know that it's quite accurate to say that it wasn't recognized as a major site for centuries. European settlers pretty much immediately recognized the area as evidence of a large civilization. They just didn't believe anyone related to Plains Indians were capable of monumental architecture, so they instead cooked up legends about the "mound builders" that typically insinuated that they were built by a European culture - one of the lost tribes of Israel is a popular suspect - that had since disappeared.
As far as I know, this idea is a creation of the Mormon church, which believes (based on their foundational holy text) that all native Americans are descended from a lost tribe of Israel, and which has spent significant resources sending archeologists around North America to prove this theory. (It turns out that if you lead with your conclusions, it is hard to do science. Some of the investigations of physical evidence are alright, but the reasoning and conclusions drawn from them are farcical.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeology_and_the_Book_of_Mo...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Lost_Tribes#Native_America...
It was really good. But to your point, I'd say: don't assume that Europeans didn't believe the Plains Indians were incapable of the monumental architecture so much as a good many of the settlers actively wanted that knowledge suppressed, primarily for their own economic reasons (if it was on your farm land you made a living on, what would you do?)
A good portion of the potential sites were deliberately destroyed. Especially in the modern era. Huge battles about strip malls, highways, parking lots and other construction. People knew to some degree what was there and the fact that it was there was inconvenient to the other narrative: the rise of America and its glory. So artifacts were destroyed and sites suppressed.
Perhaps Native American cities were in a uniquely bad spot. On the one hand, plagues spread more in cities than among nomads. But on the other hand their ancestors had not lived for millennia with such germs; especially not the particular ones which the Europeans brought.
And maybe even the Bronze Age collapse was similar. Lots of cities then would have been populated by people whose ancestors had been nomads a few centuries ago. As the size and number of such cities grew, you could imagine some critical point is reached where devastating plagues recur.
Cahokia, though, was abandoned 250 years before that, in the early 1300s.
The geographic block is futile and ineffective as a liability protection.
In other words, to what court will you take your case? A US court won't hold a US company to account for breaking a non-US law. A European court has no jurisdiction to impose any penalties on a non-European company.
Does the LA Times have EU offices? How are you tying the two together otherwise?
In theory can’t an european court request the US gov. To hand over the CEO for illegal activities ?
Not that this case would go these lengths and I have not idea of any merit of OP’s point.
Cite?
That is such a sad thing. While a hundred years might seem like a "long time" it really isn't. Imagine some city in 1920 (like say New York) with its population 5 million souls, was now an empty ruin.
What will become of a hundred thousand towns across the world as the temperatures rise and their water dries up?
What do you do and how did you end up there?
Being able to collect detailed records of archaeological finds, including things like soil stratigraphy that require very specialized knowledge, is an important part of preserving the heritage associated with these artifacts. An artifact that's been stripped of its provenance has been stripped of almost all its scientific value.
It's also potentially illegal - always on state and federal lands, and even on private land you need to get the owner's permission. (http://www.kshs.org/p/kansas-antiquities-act-statute/14587)
And pronounced "Ar-KAN-zes" City for some reason.
Tradition says the English and French pronounced the same Native tribe differently. Through Wichita, the river is the "ar-Kansas River," but through Little Rock, it's the "Arkansaw." (I see some others say there are potentially two Sioux words at issue)
https://www.businessinsider.com/why-we-pronounce-kansas-and-...
Lots of news websites seem to think they can't function without tracking readers. I wonder how they got by when street corner newsstand were the only way to get views.
They got by because people paid them money to buy the newspaper.
EX: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Express_(Washington,_D.C._ne...
Here's a good, fairly non-technical guide on things you can do to avoid geoblocking. It's targeted at Australian shoppers but would also be relevant to Europeans wanting to access international websites.