Oh my. Please tell me you’re joking or using extreme sarcasm as humor. If not, that would be a dangerously weak and nonsensical philosophy tantamount to thoughtcrime. Assault is getting up in your face with intimidation and imminent violence. Calling speech “abusive” is often a dog-whistle for academic totalitarianism that bans people outright without any process and eliminates debate because there’s “accepted” ideas and then there’s outlaws whom aren’t allowed to participate in the discourse. That’s not rigorous academics or openness to ideas, but touchy childishness, often attempting to control and subjugate other people with facist-modalities of draconian control.. to the point boys and others have to walk on eggshells, lest they offend hypersensitive, power-hungry control-freaks. Worse, only exchanging “approved” ideas leads to Dark Ages stagnation and materially-weak academics that could well be superseded by superior ideas, technologies and academic institutions that are more open and rigorous elsewhere.

The problem originates thin-skinned toddler with their safe-spaces, microaggressions and crybully reactionary-outrage, brow-beating BS, which mostly grew out of the hierarchy of victimhood anti-white-straight-male ideologues, ... compounded by faculty, staff and parents whom fail to correct them, set sensible boundaries and lead-by-example.