Ajit Pai grilled by lawmakers on why FCC spread “myth” of DDoS attack
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
How many executive heads rolled? Went to jail?
> "[T]he IG found that you made a series of misrepresentations to Congress about the event, which were corrected for the first time in the IG's Report," the Democrats wrote in their letter to Pai.
> The United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia declined to prosecute anyone at the FCC even though making false statements to Congress can be punished with fines or imprisonment.
I wonder if further inquiry into this will lead to charges being pressed.
For an industry measured in the many-billions of dollars, per year for many years.. how many wanna-be Fortune Magazine cover cuties would do that ? lots. This is all conjecture, for the record.. think for yourself
Washington needs more corporal punishment.
> I am deeply disappointed that the FCC’s former Chief Information Officer (CIO) [David Bray], who was hired by the prior Administration and is no longer with the Commission, provided inaccurate information about this incident to me, my office, Congress, and the American people.
This information is conspicuously absent from the article. Was the statement revoked?
Did you read the article? This part seems to answer your question:
"The FCC's lies to Congress were contained in letters Pai sent to lawmakers but were based on the assertions of former FCC CIO David Bray, the IG's report said. Pai has claimed that the IG report proves that he did nothing wrong, but House Democrats want to know exactly when Pai found out that Bray's statements about DDoS attacks were false."
Did you respond to the original commenter about posting blatant dis-information, as the information requested was in the article?
I figured it would be a quote with the others.
Glad it's explained.