Hacker News Reader

>Some of people's criticisms about refugees are totally valid.

What are the valid criticisms? I don't know of any.

>Unless a person is willing to integrate with their host country's society and accept their culture, you won't be welcomed in. I think that's a very reasonable bar to hold people to.

This argument is not convincing to me at all.

I've lived in California, New York, and Florida and if your requirement for refugees is to learn the culture of all these different places I would say it's impossible.

How does people coming to the United States, speaking a different language, eating different food, and holding different beliefs affect your life in any way?

>I haven't seen anyone seriously calling for an outright ban of all refugees, so that seems like a bit of a strawman.

I think this is dishonest. Many people are calling for an outright ban on refugees.

>Why aren't you criticizing all these other countries that barely take in refugees?

Because I'm not a citizen of other countries and I actually believe refugees and immigrants in general are good for this country.

>How does people coming to the United States, speaking a different language, eating different food, and holding different beliefs affect your life in any way?

Eventually it becomes South Miami where there are parts where workers don't speak English. Kind of sucks when you try to order from a butcher shop and have to point at the meat and then the grinder.

>>I haven't seen anyone seriously calling for an outright ban of all refugees, so that seems like a bit of a strawman.

>I think this is dishonest. Many people are calling for an outright ban on refugees.

Yea it's impossible to really argue this. Some do yes. Many just want increased vetting.

Language is all I really care about. I don't understand how you can mesh with a society at all if you can't even speak to them. Eat and do whatever the hell you want, at the very least know English though.

> Eventually it becomes South Miami where there are parts where workers don't speak English. Kind of sucks when you try to order from a butcher shop and have to point at the meat and then the grinder.

Yeah, that would be kinda annoying.

Leaving innocent people to die in a totalitarian hellhole ought to demand a slightly higher bar than "kinda annoying."

No. Immigration should be at the pleasure of and to the benefit of the host population. Every population should have the right to control who enters their land.

And we can't save them all, anyways. If everyone living in a totalitarian regime showed up in the US they would vastly outnumber the current Americans.

> Every population should have the right to control who enters their land.

Obviously nations have the right to do that. I don't think anyone has said otherwise. Saying "your right to not be tortured and killed by a tyrannical government is less important than my right to prompt convenience at the grocery store" is still a dick move.

Should the US rescue all of them? You seem eager to give away other people’s country.

> Should the US rescue all of them?

I never said that. See my reply to ApolloFortyNine.

> You seem eager to give away other people’s country.

It's my country too, thanks.

Just want to point out, again, that right now you are specifically arguing that convenience at the butcher's is more important than human life. Are you really making your point effectively and convincingly?

We're being realistic, you can't save everyone. There's billions of people who have a quality of life magnitudes below yours and mine. It's naive to think we can simply allow them all into our country without consequence.

In that case shouldn't the U.S allow in the vast majority of Africa?

Where do you draw the line? There's only 300 million people in the U.S. A quick search reveals that 780 million people don't have access to clean water. What do you do?

I don't know exactly where to draw the line, but we can start with not sending actual refugees back home to die.

As someone who came to the US as a refugee, the differences are far more nuanced than the food you eat or the language you speak. An insular community may legitimately feel threatened by the influx of outsiders. I've witnessed first-hand industries that have been rendered inaccessible to native-born folks through immigration (construction trades). I consider myself lucky to have had the chance to move across continents, but I also think that it's completely natural and rational to keep the door of your home shut to strangers.

> The US is still accepting a very large number of refugees relative to the rest of the world.

Your number only includes resettled refugees, i.e. it doesn’t include asylum seekers who came to the country by their own means. That number would look completely different.

While it’s great that the USA still accepts tens of thousands of resettled refugees, the number per capita is low: only 102 per 1 million residents. There would be room for much more. These resettled people are all thoroughly vetted, and they’ve waited for years in camps in the worst areas of the world. Canada takes in seven times more.

If you look at the latest data (2016) from the UNHCR you will see this picture: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/G3qnc/2/

Neighboring countries in conflict regions tend to be most heavily affected by migration as conflict is a primary cause.

Some numbers (also available in the link above) to give perspective:

  Country or territory of asylum	Refugees per 1 million  USD (GDP)	Refugees to 1,000 inhabitants
  Lebanon	19.48	169.16
  Turkey	3.35	36.04
  Germany	0.19	8.3
  Denmark	0.11	5.89
  Canada	0.06	2.68
  United States	0.01	0.84

Not per capita though.

> The US has historically accepted more refugees than every other country in the world put together

This sounds like the case for, not the case against. Yes, we have this proud tradition and it's yet another thing that makes the US exceptional.

From 'The New Colossus' (1883):

"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Salvadoran refugees are nothing if not "tempest-tost." And it's likely that the gang warfare over running their country is due in no small part to our countless interventions into central American politics.