Hacker News Reader

> we use induction to reason all the time

Yes, people use all kinds of invalid reasoning techniques and fall victim to a wide variety of logical fallacies and cognitive biases. That doesn't mean that any of them are valid.

View on HN

I think you are expecting the term 'validity' to mean more than what it technically means to people in philosophy, which is that it 'adheres to the form of either Modus Ponens or Modus Tollens'. Colloquially it has come to mean more like what soundness means, which is valid but also with true premises.

I don't want to quibble over terminology. Inductive reasoning is wrong. Mistaken. Bogus. Intellectually bankrupt. Utterly without redeeming value of any kind. As likely to lead to correct conclusions as reading Tarot cards (which is to say, the probability is higher than 0, but not by a wide enough margin to have any utility).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com