An 11-Year-Old Changed the Results of Florida's Presidential Vote at DEFCON
buzzfeednews.com
buzzfeednews.com
BuzzFeed's headline: "An 11-Year-Old Changed The Results Of Florida's Presidential Vote At A Hacker Convention."
If all you see is the headline, that's exactly the impression you're going to get. Lampshading it halfway through the article doesn't counteract that.
But y'know what? Good for them. That's step one to figuring out their own exploits. And it makes you think: If even a preteen can pick up the gist of how to do the exploit, you could imagine paying someone to go around and try to run it on election day. They don't need to be very smart, just hard up for cash and willing to take a dumb risk.
Fixed that for you.
They also believe that Russia literally hacked into voting registers and changed votes too. They are confused with the Russia/DNC hack connection, though, but evidence to the contrary has not convinced them otherwise. So they think "voting can easily be hacked, but I hate Trump, so I need to make sure that I vote."
(100% against voting machines, but this article doesn't seem to know what it's talking about.)
And yes, it's important to be precise when you're reporting on something. It's the details that make the story. What happened if he said "Windows 4.0"? Would people think Windows CE 4.0 (supported until 2012) or Windows NT 4.0 (out of support for well over a decade).
>In another area of DEFCON, organizers set up a semicircle of computers preloaded with copies of secretaries of states’ websites to allow young children to try to alter the appearance of a vote result .... Notably, the kids were instructed to use a simple database hacking tactic called SQL injection .... Within a few minutes, Audrey, 11, had figured it out, and made it appear that libertarian candidate Darrell Castle had won Florida’s presidential vote in 2016.
The discussion about the vulnerability and the unwillingness of the companies to secure them was more important.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_auditable_voting_sy...
In reading the headline I was expecting they would explain it within the first few paragraphs but instead buried what the kid did in the last 5 sentences of the article.
Like most of us though still alarms me that these machines are in use and have some easily exploitable vulnerabilities but as mentioned by one of the vendors in the article some/most of these exploits require physical access to the voting machine. Not to take way from the exploits but it would be pretty obvious if someone was doing this (plugging a device into the voting machine) on election day.
Poll workers (or someone posing as a poll worker) could easily do this and it wouldn't be noticed as suspicious because poll workers are naturally assumed to be allowed to interact with the poll machines.
"What are you doing there?"
"Oh, just updating the firmware to protect against a new zero-day threat."
There is also variance in where you vote what machine they might have. My location has always been a scantron type and only one device per voting location. You'd have to know ahead of time what device is used where and have the correct exploit handy. Still in my scenario going to be hard to pull off an exploit while people are waiting to enter their ballots into the machine.
Not saying it couldn't be done but I'd say it is out there for a probable attack. They do make for good headlines and of course are something no one wants to see tampered with. I'm glad the one's in my district still have a paper trail, which has been used in the past to verify votes by hand when the election was close.
There was a SQL backed lab setup with loaded results from Secretary of States websites, for kids to attempt SQL injection attacks.
SQL injections are child's play. Literally. It's last decade's "hack", if we can call it that. Using parameterized queries ( which you should be doing in the first place ) or simple defensive measures nullifies sql injection threats. The headline is clickbait nonsense.
Also it's a shame that defcon has turned into a "disney" event. Who even attends it anymore other than families and FBI agents and slimey salesmen peddling their software.