If you disagree, say why you disagree. Don't just say "your viewpoint has no substance".
I get what you mean about trite, inflammatory comments, but I don't think the one you're objecting to qualifies. It points out a non-obvious implication of accepting someone's request to die. I see a clear difference between that and something like, "sure, let everyone who feels hopeless die, that sure saves money on people who aren't worth saving!".
For some reason, mental/emotional problems are not treated differently from physical ones here, it's perverse. Some physical problems we don't have the technology to heal, allowing people relief from the pain they suffer from them is reasonable. But I'd wager the large majority of mental and emotional problems can be healed, given enough care, time and love.
But love is in short supply already, so may be that's not reasonable.
Perhaps our biological instinct for survival simply kicks in and whereas many people all throughout history have taken direct/bloody route to an exit, some of us just can't seem to do it.
Most methods have non zero chance of survival and consequences.
You weren't built to kill yourself, you were built to survive. That makes it difficult to harm yourself even if it would allow escape.
The world has too many people, why not let those who want to leave leave