Moderation != censorship. When facebook can send you to jail for your speech, then we can talk about censorship. I don't want to live in a world where I can't ban bad actors from my own servers (thus violating my freedom of speech).
Trying to moderate "hate speech", which is highly subjective, is a losing proposition.
In this case, Facebook - presuming what they did was "follow the rules" - is following censorship rules.
So perhaps the thread should be about the US government forcing companies to censor free speech for them.
It's fairly easy to get people onboard with the idea of moderation, once you insist that that's censorship you now have a population that's "ok with censorship" which is exactly what the fascists trying to make the equality want.
Merely, this specific act of moderation was an implementation of censorship.
Moderation and censorship are two different things that are not mutually exclusive.
You are presenting a false dichotomy.