IMF staff made misjudgments in Greece, became cheerleaders for the euro (2016)
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
“In a monetary union, the basics of debt dynamics change as countries forgo monetary policy and exchange rate adjustment tools,” said the report. This would be amplified by a “vicious feedback between banks and sovereigns”, each taking the other down. That the IMF failed to anticipate any of this was a serious scientific and professional failure."
This is so obvious it boggles the mind how it could be ignored or not seen. Anti Eurozone people have been saying it since the formation of the Eurozone.
Another issue is that the Euro is not a bad thing for all the countries in it. Germany, for instance, as a big exporter, get a currency devaluation for free an unencumbered access to a huge market. Interestingly, this success of the German economy have not reflected, for the best, in the quality of life of most of the Germans, but maybe, this is a discussion for other day (even if in my opinion is really the same issue, see first paragraph).
Meanwhile, Germany's annual net contribution to the EU is €220 per person. I'm not pointing this out to complain–the EU is worth far more than that, and seeing the giant improvements these transfers have supported in Eastern Europe, or Ireland, or Portugal makes their usefulness obvious.
But suggesting that Germany (and the other countries involved) took on billions and billions in risk hoping to earn what are obviously below-market returns is laughable. Not everything is motivated by money.
So, basically we saved those banks, make the life of the Greeks worse in the process, and now they owe even more money than before.
The German contribiution to the EU is not guaranteed to make it's way back into the Greek economy. And Germans could perhaps use an unpaved country road to travel and move goods to and from Greece instead of a highway that passes through 5 different states, of which two are not even in the EU but have received money from the EU exactly for this kind of infrastructure.
The European Council is just the assembly of the EU's heads of governments.
It's basically the same system as it is for the US' FED, or most other central banks for that matter. The only difference is that it's not a single head of state but the group of 18. But then again the US Senate also needs to consent for FED appointments, and it's a rather similar body of regional delegates.
It's also doubtful that the ECB had any meaningful choices since 2008. The low-interest, quantitative-easing policy is common among all the relevant central banks, including not just the US but also Britain or Japan.
Or that they will thread to stop the payment systems if some state don't bend to their will like the ECB did [1]?
Anyway, the problem is not the ECB, but the lack of a federal capacity.
[1] https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu/2017/03/14/the-campaign-goes-...
But to Puerto Rico? Yes, very much so. To Detroit? Sure!
And for the inhabitants, this is a good thing. Look at Venezuela to see what happens when a country devalues its currency to pay its debts.
The situation would have been even better (for the Greek people) if the European Union hadn't permitted Greece to introduce capital controls (which negated some of the advantages of a currency not tied to the Greek economy).
What do you think happens when you devalue your currency to pay your debts?
What makes hyperinflation unique is that the price is ultimately sunk by the actions of panicked citizens who rush to spend their fiat currency because they think that it won't have value in the coming days/weeks/months. This is like a domino effect and eventually everyone jumps on the bandwagon, thus flooding the market with currency that wasn't circulating or contributing to the GDP.
Hyperinflation usually comes right after a short-lived deflationary period which, in turn, comes after a very long period of high inflation (10-30% typically). You can clearly see the pattern in Venezuela's inflation chart: https://www.businessinsider.com/venezuela-hyperinflation-cha...
Because of this $1 equals 206941.00 Venezuelan Bolivar, up from $1=119k Bolivar from a month ago, which in turn was up from $1=10 Bolivar from February (according to Google - not sure how accurate it is).
Misinformation is easy when people don’t think through what they are hearing.
And maybe there's a consensus that everything is lower priority than ever-closer integration. Great for Commissioners, not so great for Greek pensioners.
This is the fundamental issue. It's not a surprise. It has been explained by many commentators even before the Euro existed (see, for instance: [1]).
[1] http://www.bondeconomics.com/2015/07/book-review-eurozone-dy...
https://macroaffairs.com/ten-years-after-the-financial-crisi...
> There were two decent solutions that would have ended this crisis within a year or two. One would have been that Greece default on its debts, paying back for example 30% of outstanding loans. Another would have been for Greece to leave the Euro Zone and go back to using the drachma (their currency before the Euro), and pay its creditors in the new currency. This new drachma would quickly fall in value as the Greek central bank would print more drachmas, making it easier to repay the devalued drachma loans.
How would defaulting on debts have solved any problems? Still nobody would have bought new Greek debt and since Greece was running at a deficit before it still would have run at a deficit, just without any additional funds. They still would have had to get their administration in order to actually collect taxes etc.
The second proposition is even more ridiculous, nobody would have bought the new debt, the Drachma would have been entirely worthless and any sort of import (of, e.g., medicine) would have been impossible.
Edit to add: And what happened of course proves that these two "alternatives" would have been ridiculous. Greece could easily have (on its own) decided to default or switch to a new currency. No outside power could force them to stay in the euro or pay their incurred debts. Yet somehow they decided against these measures and instead took the horrible low-interest loans offered to them.
The sufferings of Greece is first and foremost due to Greece's own faults and less due to the Euro.
Greek pensioners had very generous pensions. The Greek pension organizations had a deficit of around 10 billion euros each year, and the Greek state covered that through borrowing.
In 2001, Giannitsis, then minister of the greek government, suggested a pension system reform, which was ferociously opposed by every part of the Greek society.
Lots of people in Greece ended up getting pensions of around 1200-1300 euros (after taxes/insurance), which was extremely above what these people have given as insurance when they worked.
The end result was the Greek deficit was getting larger and larger and therefore the Greek economy blew up.
Had it been a different case, where the Greek governments made the necessary reforms, not only in the pension system but also in other sectors of the economy, Greece would never have this crisis.
The best of many good sentences IMO: "Lessons from past crises were not always applied, for example when the IMF underestimated the likely negative response of private creditors to a high-risk program".
When Greece had its own currency, it could devalue against the Deutsche Mark and keep people employed. That devaluation would cause some inflation and it would also raise interest rates a bit -- no debt bubble, no collapse of Greek industry. Rather, German industry finds that it's currency is more expensive to counteract increased Germany productivity and Germany fails to export more, and thus does not accumulate excess savings. There is no flow of jobs from Greece to Germany -- Greece keeps its jobs, Germany keeps its jobs, Greece is forced to consume a bit less with the lower Drachma relative to Germany, and Greece is forced to borrow a bit less with the higher interest rates.
With a forced peg against the DM, money was just being vacuumed out of Greece, which created a recycling problem in which excess German savings could be used to purchase Greek bonds. That lowers the interest rate in Greece artificially, creating more debt in Greece even while Greek production becomes less competitive and Greek jobs leave for Germany. That never ends well, and was only caused by the Euro.
The crisis was just the unravelling of the above unsustainable trends, but these trends were created by the Euro. You can't "until the crisis, Greece was creating these problems" -- the problems were created by the Euro.
The same thing for Greece's problems collecting taxes. When governments can't collect taxes efficiently, they print more money, creating more inflation, which is basically a tax on financial assets. So the money is still collected by the Greek government. Now that the Greek government was no longer able to print money, it was at the mercy of financial markets -- international financial markets, which of course can't help the Greek government collect money in the same way that an inflation tax can.
Greece simply has never been in a position where it could give up its own currency and join a pegged regime with Germany. All of this was foreseen as part of the folly of the European project. There are other bad effects, too.
The real lesson is that weak and corrupt governments are bad for most involved with them and very hard to fix, even if you try very hard. So, if you can, keep them at arm's length. They should never have been allowed to join the euro. In fact, given their conflicts with Turkey and Macedonia, they shouldn't have been allowed to join the EU at all.
Yes and no. Those reviewing those books (and originally allowing Greece to enter the Euro) were rather blind (selective or politically induced blindness).
What conflicts are these, pray tell? If you think Erdogan is just sitting quietly, minding his own business, while the evil Greeks plot to expand their empire into Turkey, you're either dangerously misguided or a troll.
EU membership isn’t an award for good behavior, it’s a strategic choice made to achieve certain goals.
See, for example, Ukraine joining NATO.
Back when the Greek had the Drachma, the the Greek state had to pay high interest on its debt, and part of the reason for that was the possibility of a devaluation. The high cost of debt service was a burden on the economy, including on employment.
i remember when i was on holiday as a kid around 1999 when the banking euro was introduced there were all these signs with prices in ECU (European Currency Unit). Back home everything was still in Guilders. My dad told me it would yet be a long time before greece would be financially stable enough to adopt the euro. yet they wanted it so much they used some creative bookkeeping to get in the same time we in holland did. was that the smartest thing ever? maybe not. but it was their choice. perhaps if the books had not been cooked, we would not have accepted them into the euro. And they would not be in this situation.
> no collapse of Greek industry.
In fact, Greece's industries have collapsed during the late 70s, 80s and 90s, when Greece had the Drachma.
The reason is economies of scale: local industries cannot compete with global ones.
The reason for the the debt crisis is that the Euro countries are working with what is, essentially, a foreign currency. There is not fiscal capacity that will solve the possible problems, like, for instance, there is in the USA.
So, the Central European Bank is, against the spirit and probably the letter of the agreements, doing the work that a federal government should be doing. They are buying public debt in the secondary market and that is what have saved the Euro (for now).
The design of the Euro is flawed from the beginning and comments like yours show that fixing the issue is probably impossible, because it feels good to blame others instead of facing the issue, and because when we feel so above other countries, who would like to share a fiscal capacity with those losers? So, interesting times ahead.
That's the real lesson here.
Presumably some lands in Germany are deficitary (or states from the USA) why the population there don't experiment the same problems? Because they have a real union.
Currently the ECB is covertly financing countries of the European Union buying their debt in the secondary market [1]. This is against the agreements [2], but if it's not done will be the end of the Euro. How is not that a dysfunctional currency area?
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2015-12-04/the-ecb-s...
[2] https://elpais.com/elpais/2012/10/24/inenglish/1351097206_05...
False. Greece was in need of high rates to lower consumption and debt increase. Instead of that, and for the benefit of Germany that was in need of more debt to pay for the reunification, rates were lowered to historical minimums.
If your debt is increasing like crazy and your currency lowers the rates the result is well known. Greece could not change the rates, so they were not in control anymore.
That does not mean that Greece has not big problems. But to blame all on them makes no sense. German banks could have stopped lending money at any time, but they are seen just as victims instead of greed instigators.
You make $1000 a month but have a credit card that offers you increasingly poor rates due to your inability to make payments on time. Your monthly expenditures on medicine, food, and rent are $1500.
Are you at fault or is the system at fault? Obviously you just need to decrease your spending - so it's you. Just move somewhere cheaper, eat less, and don't get sick. Obviously it's your choice.
The main problem among EU members is the lack of reforms. Devaluation has been used as a panacea for all manner of economic ills, but devaluation achieves nothing except inflation and decimation of income, savings and assets.
Without the ability to devalue, members are in a vice, and the only way out is much needed reform.
In the case of Greece, things are so broken that reform is very hard, but at least their suffering serves as a warning to others who thing they can get away with it in the long term.
Should all the countries to be net exporters at the same time? Sounds mathematically impossible.
More interestingly, should Greece to become Germany without making any investments? only by reducing their economy? All this is craziness.
In any currency union is going to be imbalances, that's unavoidable. I don't think I have to cite examples here, only think in your own country, whatever it is, and you will see that it's true. The solution is a fiscal capacity that compensate those imbalances. If you are not ready to finance those lazy Greeks, then you can't be in the same currency union that they are. So simple like that.
I agree that the arrangement is probably by design. It makes it even more evil, in my opinion.
Portugal and Spain (and Ireland) implemented some of these reforms and, lo and behold, a few years later are some of the fastest growing economies in the Eurozone.
https://qz.com/1207039/portugals-economy-is-growing-at-its-f...
https://www.ft.com/content/be9d3fdb-d2fd-335c-929a-09b69752e...
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/irish-economy-gr...
Why Greece should be any different (as an Italian, why Italy as well?)
And let's not forget that to orthodox economists, any social security program is overly generous.
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/ireland-s-gdp-fi...
Ireland is a tax haven.
Here is some prediction for you: you tell me that Spain and Portugal have reformed and that's the reason their economy is growing. At some point, this will change, do you want to bet what will be the proposed solution? More reforms.
The reforms mantra is only a way of dismantling the welfare state. That is: of a way of avoiding redistribution to the people that need it more. If you think that can be done without a political backslash you are in for a surprise.
Monetary devaluation and increasing national debt had long been used by Italy and other countries as a fig leaf to avoid addressing historical problems that these reforms try to address.
The EU has removed this fig leaf. Errors have been made and the crisis should have been handled better, but it does not exempt these countries from having to fix their own problems.
I know you're satirizing the stereotype, I just want to mention this:
I don't understand how in a technology forum this idea is so popular.
Germany is more productive because it has more technology. That technology is the result of investment, not of austerity. So, now, if you want to change Greece, you know what to do.
Right, they work smarter by using technology. I did not address the policies that created that situation, let alone attempt to contrast Germany and Greece.
The labor force participation rate for Germany is 78% but only 68% for Greece[0]. So almost a third of working-age (defined here as 15 to 64) people in Greece aren't in the official workforce but those that are work many hours (important to remember than some portion of those not working are raising children and/or providing elder care).
[0] https://data.oecd.org/emp/labour-force-participation-rate.ht...
It's not about becoming Germany, it's about being less dysfunctional. The root of all that is that Greece should never have been accepted in the EU in the first place (when e.g. Serbia will get in, it will be in much better shape than Greece ever was), but was anyway to kind of ensure they would not turn to the Warsaw pact...
Their suffering and other countries suffering are empowering extremism around Europe. And the lesson people learn is to not trust the government and to not trust economists. And they learn that for good reasons.
To punish people to make them learn does not work. Dog trainers have known for long that punishing dogs to change their behaviour only create abnormal behaviour. It is even worse. As citizens have been punished while bankers, the main culprits, have been saved creating a dangerous moral hazard.
I agree with the post that "made a series of calamitous misjudgments in Greece, became euphoric cheerleaders for the euro project, ignored warning signs of impending crisis, and collectively failed to grasp an elemental concept of currency theory".
Paul Graham's def: 'attacks the characteristics or authority of the writer without addressing the substance of the argument'
https://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/how-to-disagree-well-7-of-t...
Also, while it’s correct the British media has been using the mistakes the EU made during the financial crisis (which were the same as the mistakes the British made, who self-imposed austerity and continue to do so), the reality is none of these actually apply to the UK which has its own currency and as a result has/had dramatically more financial freedom.
The UK essentially had the best of the EU and had avoided the worst of it. It’s amazinf that they voluntarily gave up that deal.
Is this true of current-day Greece (and future Greece, since things are only getting worse)?
In fact if I was Greek I would want to stay in the Euro zone (but keep my money in a German bank).
A "no" vote was seen as a "leave from the Euro zone" vote by the average citizen. It was the Greek government that ignored the referendum, not the Greeks.
That wasn't what was on the ballot paper.
Keen in the way a person who is shovelling doughnuts in to their face is keen to lose weight. They've done basically zero about major flaws that prevent their entry; indeed rather than stop human rights offenses Erdogan has multiplied them.
To me, it seems more like Erdogan played the EU card to get internal and external critics off his back - and now that he has "consolidated" his support at home, he doesn't need the EU card, also you can only play it out so many times before it gets old.