This is not the same as Plaid and Mint, where we explicitly give those services access to our accounts in exchange for direct benefits to us.
This is not the same as Plaid and Mint, where we explicitly give those services access to our accounts in exchange for direct benefits to us.
Does the article discuss the bank account owner’s permission? I don’t see how this could be done without explicit permission.
https://www.fullwsj.com/articles/facebook-to-banks-give-us-y...
Please excuse my tone, I'm literally (a tiny bit) and figuratively (much more so) sick with disgust.
I can't get away from any of the major data collectors while living in the US. I couldn't even get away from the data collectors living in Europe - I have so many friends here in the US. Their communications aren't subject to the GDPR.
Take it a step farther and vote against anyone with a (D) or (R) next to their name on the ballot.
The current federal government is so far out of step with the populace that a blanket anti-incumbent rule doesn't seem all that bad. The only real question is whether to vote against them in the general election, or just the primaries.
There is a very real possibility that someone else on the ballot is actually worse than the incumbent, which barely seems possible, yet here we are.
A vote "against" without communicating intent doesn't drive recourse in the way you would like.
"X is the most important issue to me this election cycle, and will determine whether I vote for you and donate to your campaign" is clearer and more powerful.
1. Refer to https://www.justicedemocrats.com for a voting guide.
2. Register and participate in local DSA. Sign up here: https://www.dsausa.org