The only thing rubbish here is blatant disregard for freedom of speech (Didn't really expect anything different from the fools here). There are platforms that are monopoly and they control free speech at this point.
Infowars is and should remain free to publish content independently of these providers, which they can easily do.
In what sense? Apple has a minority of the market. And podcasts are decentralised.
> 48% of population voted for trump
My friends who voted for Trump would find it insulting for anyone to assume they are therefore InfoWars nutters.
Of course a private entity can disregard morality for the good of the public in their decisions (they're after profits), but what happens when that private entity becomes the town square? Or when it has monopoly over something that has become a basic utility for everyone?
At this time I'm starting to cringe at opinions defending these actions with "it's a private entity".
It's his right to continue to spew his garbage, he just has to do it elsewhere.
This is one company/guy getting booted off a private platform. He is still able to go to other platforms or apply for public permits to express his viewpoint.
This xkcd seems to fit here.