100 AI-generated wikipedia articles ready to be published

Sorry, I checked a few, and these are very much not ready to be published. Rampant copyright violation, for one.

The "articles" appear to be a snippet of text grabbed from somewhere else, and then a list of "events" which are... also grabbed from other places?

Please don't spam Wikipedia.

This is literally the definition of spam. You're creating work for Wikipedia volunteer editors for the purpose of promoting your company.

I think "ready to be published" is a bit of editorializing on the part of the HN poster. There's nothing on the page that says that.

Instead, I think this is intended as a starting point for human editors to make articles about underrepresented scientists. For that purpose, I this is really cool. The blog post can provide some more context: https://blog.primer.ai/technology/2018/08/03/Quicksilver.htm...

Very first article (https://quicksilver.primer.ai/adrian_j._luckman/) contains nonsense. Who is O'Leary? What's a rift tip? How does it relate to the previous sentences?

These are perhaps the best laid out articles I've ever seen (example: https://quicksilver.primer.ai/Adrian_J._Luckman/). Not only is the typography stunning, but there's no friction between the reader and the information.