Can somebody explain to me why fcnfhdn got -3 points here? it's his/her opinion about the article's look which to me is his/her prerogative. it is feedback to the writer about one of the aesthetic element of the piece so it is relevant to the discussion. I'm puzzled at this seemingly random negativity. thanks.
Doesn't contribute anything useful to the discussion. If his intent was actually to provide valuable feedback, he could send the author an email instead of leaving snarky comments on another website.