Regular sauna users may have fewer chronic diseases
reuters.com
reuters.com
"Two recent experimental studies by Lee et a and Laukkanen et al in 100 men and women (56% men; age, 32-75 years) with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor reported reductions in both systolic BP and diastolic BP after 30-minute sauna bathing sessions. In addition to reductions in BP, sauna bathing led to positive alterations in measures of arterial stiffness such as pulse wave velocity."
https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(18)...
The more interesting research question is under what circumstances would a sauna bath be recommended over other interventions?
I don't mean to knock this paper in particular, the lack of active controls is endemic to academic research in health.
In Finland even "sick" people go to the sauna all the time. It depends on the sickness though: fever and sauna don't mix for obvious reasons. But otherwise people do it.
Looking at the list of ailments in the article, I don't see them being a showstopper for going to a sauna.
For example, regular sauna is often helpful for people with asthma. The Finnish sauna is humid (one throws water to the hot rocks). There are variants within Finland too: a smoke sauna + asthma might not work.
My point is: the argument of "sick people do not use sauna" is false.
Finnish saying: "if tar, booze or sauna does not cure you, it is fatal". (Tar was used for skin ailments and wounds etc.)
The bigger issue is that observational results often invert cause and effect, and without any clever instrumental perturbation, such studies are merely hypothesis generating.
However, I can certainly imagine that a sauna gets your heart rate up and your metabolism into overdrive trying to cool you down.
The human body burns roughly a fixed set of calories--it simply shunts those calories between the systems it considers to be immediately important.
If you are shunting one or two hundred calories a day to cooling yourself off, that's a bunch of calories your body can't throw at creating chronic conditions.
... or fighting off chronic conditions either.
And, yes, doing this does remove calories from the ability to fight off "acute" conditions.
It's a tradeoff.
Well, of course. Fighting off the creation of chronic conditions.