Yeah, we could use some more traffic and pollution from everyone driving 10 miles for lunch.
As a progressive liberal, california democrats confuse me all the time.
Yeah, we could use some more traffic and pollution from everyone driving 10 miles for lunch.
As a progressive liberal, california democrats confuse me all the time.
(no way in favor of the ban, I like my free lunch very much)
First, this doesn't eliminate existing cafeterias, it just bans new ones. Second, cafeterias exist for two reasons - pricing and convenience. If, as you hypothesize, cafeterias closed (which is not what's happening here) and everyone was forced to find other options, I would imagine that a good portion of these people would opt to bring their own lunch from home, for those same two reasons - pricing and convenience. After all, why spend 40 minutes in line for a $15 lunch when you can make a damn good one at home for ~$6 and eat it virtually whenever you'd like?
Disclaimer: I do not support the city's decision here, but I also don't think it's as big of a travesty as people are making it out to be.