Bots Are Playing a Bigger Role in the Election Than People Realize (2016)
dev.to
dev.to
In the context of this article my biggest problem is that there's an assumption that only one side is easily manipulated (i.e. those idiots who voted for Trump but left to their own devices would have voted for Clinton) and only one side does the manipluating (i.e. our side puts out an honest version of the facts which obviously is complicated and difficult to understand. The other side lies to get morons to side with them.)
If we can all just get on board with the idea that everyone except for me is a simple minded dolt I think we'll all be happier.
It wouldn't be half the impact if every time they did something like this, the wider media brushed it off as "4chan did something that was meant to be provocative again".
The rational people out there aren't throwing around any such accusations, though. Instead, they rely on the documented instances of proven Russian trolls, as uncovered by law enforcement, the intelligence community, and Facebook and Twitter's security teams. Accusing an account of being on the Kremlin's dime is pretty absurd without forensic evidence. Very obviously, the vast majority of pro-Trump accounts out there are either organic, or not organic but operated by Trump-supporting US nationals.
These days Russians largely run the American conspiracy theorist scene, including people like Alex Jones and networks of similar influencers and their affiliates. One might word this in milder terms as American conspiracy theorist scene being in bed with Russia (or rather, has been infiltrated by Russian operatives long time ago). Its all the same however, it works to weaken US' presence, role and status from within. And these people call themselves patriots? Talk about pinnacle of absurdity, considering the importance of true patriotism during times like these.
>These days Russians largely run the American conspiracy theorist scene, including people like Alex Jones and networks of similar influencers and their affiliates
Do you have proof?