Or are you trying to argue that evidence of possible Russian influence over one candidate, by its very existence, is evidence that they don't have influence over that candidate?
Or are you trying to argue that evidence of possible Russian influence over one candidate, by its very existence, is evidence that they don't have influence over that candidate?
No. It's possible evidence - some of it is verifiable while other parts are simply allegations.
Can you prove that the part in the dossier about the hotel orgy was not a disinformation campaign used on western intelligence?
This is your logic.
Is President Trump the type of dude that would be into golden showers?
https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-t...
Politicizing the intelligence apparatus would be highly disturbing, even moreso than when the Obama administration apparently used the IRS to target political opponents [1] like the tea party.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRS_targeting_controversy
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/veteran-spy-gav...