Ouch. You might lose a lot of candidates with this stipulation.
Ouch. You might lose a lot of candidates with this stipulation.
He'd be a perfect candidate for the job if he weren't starting a company with me :) But I bet there are others out there like him.
That's pretty scary.
To me that sounds as though a programmer would say:
"I hardly ever compile my code on BSD, I'm usually sure it'll work just fine"
And I'd not believe him. In your case, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, but at the same time I'd urge you to test it anyway but that's from a programmers perspective again.
Happy to say that I'm one of those — the day I discovered I could do this, I felt like I leveled up.
But really, for basic page layout, the rules around floats and position: relative and so-on really aren't that hard to remember.
Woo!
In my case, it was less intermittent events and more low-latency streaming data (position/GIS stuff), so I went with the forever frame. It really is splendid for pushing data to the browser without the nasty lag.
Combine clean CSS with SCSS (http://sass-lang.com/) for mixin awesomeness and also PIE.css (http://css3pie.com/) for CSS3 on IE. Thats pretty much the winning combo IMO.
Will they hire someone remotely, especially someone with heavy ruby/rails exp?
I envy my friends who can stand to lose IE6 traffic, but my company can't and besides -- it's always a point of pride when the site looks almost perfect the first time you check it in a legacy browser like IE6.
That being said, I hope they don't mean 5.5. :)
But on the bright side, someone who has the patience to do IE compatibility is someone we'd probably love to work with!