I agree very much. It has always stung a nerve with me, the fact that if you are a scientist with no interest or knowledge in humanities or arts you get (rightfully) labeled an ignorant and a reductionist obsessed solely with his science; yet the reverse, if you have a background in the humanities and know nothing about science or mathematics, is somehow okay or even celebrated in certain circles. You can proudly declare you "understand nothing of that horrible complicated maths and physics". Boggles the mind. Many lawyers, artists, literature scholars, historians, philosophers, etc, simply don't mind being stuck inside a bubble and inside a myopic way to see the world. A different perspective, such as that offered by mathematics, of rigour and analysis, would do them a world of good, so as not to be stuck inside a bubble/echo chamber.