Ah, I see. The special thing here is the `new` keyword. When an object is created using `new myconstructor()`, the following steps occur (among others):
1. create a new empty object; call it `newObj`
2. call the constructor using `newObj` as its `this` context, so that `this.a = 1` is effectively `newObj.a = 1`
3. if the constructor has a `prototype` property defined, invoke `newObj.__proto__ = myconstructor.prototype` to establish the prototype chain on the new object
The critical distinction here is between `constructor.prototype` and `object.__proto__`. For exactly this reason, it bothers me a bit that the article uses `Prototype`, with a capital "P", to mean "the thing that `object.__proto__` points to". This is completely different from the `prototype` (small "p") property of a constructor, which is essentially just a holding place for the `__proto__` property of any objects created by calling this constructor with the `new` keyword.
Hopefully that all made sense!