If anti-evolutionists were to abandon their position due to evidence, they would have long ago.
Black-and-white worldviews are, by definition, not nuanced, but evolution, but its slow (by human standards) nature, is extremely nuanced, to the point of beeing unnoticeable.
"to the point of beeing unnoticeable"
It's not unnoticeable; read the fricking article.
As mentioned, a more radical event should happen to convince these people (so radical as to be impossible).
>“He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’ ”
As I noted, for a Creationist nothing will ever be proof of speciation. But apparently telling such simple truths gets downvoted.
> As mentioned, a more radical event should happen to convince these people (so radical as to be impossible).
No, no event, not matter how radical, would convince them because they are ideologically committed to rejecting evolution, which they see as contrary to their entire belief system.
Please explain to me how humans are immune to natural selection and then go claim your nobel prize for revolutionizing human understanding of genetics.
Why should he do that? He never claimed that -- it's a strawman of your own making.
That has never happened. You seem to be committing a naturalist fallacy.