>> In the US, employment status and your employer determine your access to health-care
I have spotted the problem.
As usual, America wins the absurdity trophy.
I have spotted the problem.
As usual, America wins the absurdity trophy.
The point is that there are no contributions, well taxes, but that doesn't go towards the individual but the health services as a whole.
Stil, your employer can buy you "better" (or at least quicker) access to private alternatives, but I don't think that's what you meant.
You have access to healthcare for small fees, and you'll generally get better care than in the private sector; you'll just have to wait longer if it's not urgent.
I know for a fact that in at least two EU capitals private hospitals often forward patients they are unable to handle (e.g. complicated births) to public hospitals, who are more skilled and experienced.
In India, this happens simply because private hospitals don't want mortalities on their hands. Complicated cases often mean higher chances of things going wrong. Best let the public hospitals handle it.