Calacanis to Challenge TechCrunch
newsgrange.com
newsgrange.com
Some links:
http://jasonlbaptiste.com/commentary/email-newsletters-busin...
http://jasonlbaptiste.com/startups/email-newsletters-are-sti...
email is slow, any news you cover is old news, that will get scooped by the blogs way before you run it.
A week's time for his editors, means that any news they cover will be severely out of date.
I run http://mydailygeek.com and my run time is only 1 day...and I find myself constantly having to pick different stories throughout the day to run with, since they get bludgeoned to death by the time the emails get sent out.
Now for me it's fine, since my focus isn't startups or the bleeding edge of tech, so the tech I do cover is just interesting stuff that my readers may have missed elsewhere...but for a "Techcrunch competitor", it's suicide.
Any scoop you get will get leaked to Techcrunch before you can run the story.
I wouldn't, since that topic has been beaten to death already.
Here is an example of content (my own writing) that is an analytical alternative to tech blogs: http://bit.ly/PublicGood
there are only so many topics you can cover, before you tun out.
Email is old and antiquated, but it is the closest thing bloggers have to push access to all their readers. I know my droid buzzes every time I get an email; it might be time for bloggers to take advantage of this.
FWIW, I launched Ruby Weekly (a weekly Ruby e-mail newsletter) just over a month ago and it now has 2200 subscribers. It's not quite TechCrunch's audience but one that has heavily used RSS in the past. By comparison, I also own the most subscribed Ruby blog with FeedBurner reporting 25k subscribers but.. I call severe shenanigans on their numbers and the "engagement per capita" from the e-mail newsletter has been very encouraging.
This was my epiphany: there are blogs I visited in the past that I really loved, but for some reason I haven't visited anymore (out of sight, out of mind). On the other hand, I still occasionally receive newsletters I signed up with 10 years ago, from sites I barely visited once.
type "how to play guitar" into google or youtube, and watch our videos.
... or check out our halo reach walkthrough http://www.mahalo.com/halo-reach-walkthrough
we're making a lot of good content that is helping our 17m unique users (11m on mahalo.com and 6m on YouTube!) every month. The massive traffic to these pages is creating nice revenue that we are reinvesting 100% of into great content.
So, give it a look.... i think you'll find it solid.
Plus, isn't sequoia peeved about him starting to invest + run a separate video network + new conference + playing poker? I hear a new product is in the pipe but their innovation has slowed since he got distracted.
2. Sequoia is not peeved, they are more excited then ever with Mahalo and the amazing performance right now. We're really crushing it on all fronts including revenue, hiring, content creation and, yes, a really killer version 4.0 that will be out next year. It's not easy to build a top 200 site in under three years... in another three years we will be in the top 50!
3. I spend an hour or two a week on ThisWeekIN.com hosting my show, This Week in Startups. That show has resulted in about five of the last seven developers we hired. It is the ULTIMATE recruiting machine for Mahalo.
4. You might notice I wear a Mahalo logo playing poker on TV along with Full Tilt (which I need to wear since I'm a Full Tilt Red Pro... I'm sponsored, yes). I play maybe five hours a week.
5. 90% of my 100 "work" week is Mahalo. Literally.... I love what I do and I'm 1,000% dedicated to Mahalo.
I'm not distracted... far from it. I'm super focused.
It sounds like he's thinking that he can build off of the success of his personal newsletter. However, the difference will be in the audience. People subscribe and connect with his personal newsletter because they want to hear what he has to say. Also, there is something sort of neat about getting an e-mail from an author in your inbox rather then passivley clicking on a bookmakred blog.
However, this doesn't sound like it will be the individual thoughts of someone like Jason. It will be a series of articles by a number of people - likely low paid people. Some of those people may be interesting and insightful, but unless they have an existing audience coming into the newsletter, the effort won't get large enough for very many advertisers to care.
This newsletter effort will work well in combination with the This Week In network. Hosts will be able to say things such as, "subscribe to our newsletter" or "get the inside scoop via e-mail".
Beyond a complimentary add-on that builds on a tiny bit of personal success, I don't see this effort being a fraction of what TechCrunch is. I think Jason is using this sensational comparison (and the whole Calacanis vs. Arrington thing) as the same word-of-mouth marketing he's well known for.
This sounds like him hiring some more people to have more articles and points of view. If it manages to continue to be thorough and nuanced, it'll be a great resource.
I love steam powered technology.
sarcasm aside, this is a good idea on the whole. just not over email. my inbox is fifth date material. I'm gonna have to create a separate email address that forwards to my rss reader, or something..
I mentioned this in the comments on AVC some time ago: I'd like to see an email service where I can modify the submittal (ex: for NAME@email, I could submit NAME-X-@email.com) where the X automatically created a sub-inbox X when replies to it came in.
http://labnol.blogspot.com/2007/08/gmail-plus-smart-trick-to...
My instinct was to make a snide remark, or to say something like "Good luck", not believing there are serious inroads to be made there (at least, not by Calacanis) -- but he speaks of a 'race to the bottom', and in writing deeper, more detailed posts than those made in an effort to be the first to break the news.
I've always felt that was an error on the part of TechCrunch, in that they are so eager to release that sometimes facts just get in the way of a story breaking. Or at least, aren't checked to the degree they ought.
I personally, welcome something like this in the market.
My initial hesitation would be that I wouldn't expect to hit this site every day, but it appears Calacanis has already thought about that as well, intending (at least to start) an email distribution, which I think fits the model nicely.
Perhaps I'll learn to start keeping my prejudices in check.
Basically, I'm trying to do long form, in-depth profiles of startup companies. Instead of begging TechCrunch to get a profile, only to be mocked in their edtiorial, we will actually get to the know the business model, founders and dig deep into their vision.
It won't be a fluff piece, but it won't be a snarky/venomous TechCrunch/Gawker article.
all the best, jason
(in London for the first Open Angel Forum here!!)
That is ridiculously easy to do.
"tech blogging is a race to the bottom" and we're "going for something that doesn’t exist in the market"
...to turn into...
"tech blogging is a race to the bottom, and we intend to win that race"
The problem is that pot-stirring, half-wrong stories, and superficial snap judgments bring the eyeballs, inlinks, discussions, and ad revenue.
A new online journalism needs specific ideas to break or reverse that entropic cycle -- at least locally (even if it persists globally) -- rather than just high-minded goals.
The advantage of running it as an opt-in email list is that you find out much more about who your readers are.
Ars Technica has managed to hold the quality fort quite well, so it's not necessarily a doomed enterprise.