> Not sure how someone becomes this irredeemable at just twenty-seven year old.
How is this a function of age?
How is this a function of age?
If anything, the guy deserves credit for spotting them earlier (than usual, if that's what you imply).
Fraud at 18? -> Stupid kid (obv., fraud is never ok)
Fraud at 45 with three dependents on the verge of bankruptcy? -> poor bloke, the choice between a big personal risk vs. failing your family really sucks (obv., fraud is never ok)
Fraud at 27 with no real responsibilities in life? -> WTF?