The Cosmetic Class
zandercutt.com
zandercutt.com
Hopefully this is a sign that this generation is forming its identity and ready to express it with some real cultural movements! I’ve been waiting eagerly for their cultural identity to emerge and express itself with authentic art, music, film, etc.
However, I also find the essay ironic. When the Internet first went mainstream, one phenomenon was “the lurker” - the fact that most, the mass majority, of internet users only “consumed content” (although, back then it wasn’t called content). That’s because few of us felt confident enough to claim enough expertise to share much. Therefore, most of us just “lurked”. We let the experts speak, and we indulged in surfing on their knowledge.
In this “Instagram era”, though, everyone is expected to be a “content creator”. (e.g. everyone has a github!) But, to be one, one unfortunately misses out on a long history of prior work. One gets so bogged down by creating new content and reading all of the new content created within the previous few hours, that much of the past 108 years of knowledge and wisdom isn’t fully accessible. And, although the author seems to try to escape that vortex, they also seem to have ignored that they’re mostly reinventing ideas that were created between McLuhan and 2010.
But, that is ok! I actually read the whole thing and enjoyed it (because it also kinda reminded me of reading Zines). Yeah, as others have said, it could use some editing, but at least it has paragraphs!
I think it's already happening/happened, it's just not as easy to see and commodify because media is not being funneled through a few mediums. I don't think we'll ever see these large generational "identities" like we did pre-internet and especially pre-social-media. I predict that from now on the defining identity trait is that there is no defining trait. You can choose one identity from the many pre-existing ones or create your own, then find your community online to make you feel good about your choice.
I also enjoyed the article. Not perfect but hey, it's fostering discussion. I'm actually more interested in their authenticity article, which I will read next
> one unfortunately misses out on a long history of prior work... that much of the past 108 years of knowledge and wisdom
Just curious why 1910 is the magic date here for "knowledge and wisdom"?
I think there may be something to taking a step back from knowing what hundreds, thousands of strangers think about a given thing at a given point in time.
You might have overdosed on memes, my dude.
> The truth, then, is this: our generation was raised with the understanding that the image we portrayed mattered more than who we actually were not out of some malevolent, externally imposed agenda, but because it was actually true. The result was that nothing we ever did felt organic; instead, everything felt like a checked box.
As every generation before? Why even speak about generation here? This seems like an absurd reduction from the author, while this is the kind of thing you learn to recognize as you age and you start seeing the word with your own eyes. Most people becomes disillusioned as time goes on, seeing how much public action is fake.
A much more interesting analysis would be to show how the new engaging platforms distord this longstanding social behavior (signaling), amplifying it or distording it. But to say that they are an "Instagram" generation is giving far too much credit to Instagram. The world was not "disrupted" by Instagram, it was only a lens and a way to capitalize on this behavior.
I could go on with the "lost authenticity", but I feel I'm just trying to justify the time taken to read this empty piece.
But on second thought it is a bit ironic that a piece so critical of “signaling” and empty gestures (the author cites things like joining student counsel) would be posted to the author’s personal blog. I think it would have leant credibility to the article if the author had the self awareness to point out the fact that blogs are a form of self promotion not too far removed from Instagram.
It might be that we're more sensitive to - and insightful about - the social phenomena that stem from personality traits not unlike our own (on some level at least).
Stylistic points aside, I strongly disagree that the obsession with image has been the same with every generation. It's existed, for sure, but substance used to matter more. For example, college admissions were previously more reliant on tests than they are today. Kids are stuck in a vicious circle of pretending to care more and more about things they hate like public service and high school sports--that's, I think, the point of the article, and it's an important point to make, even if the article's style could use some polishing.
I'm pretty sure that clause has been on the lips of every generation that isn't the youngest since the end of subsistence farming.
This must be the best description of fb/insta mechanics.
Yes, they can solve whatever tricky questions you throw at them because they've lots of experience working on low level stuff.
People's eyes are so used to Instagram people that they think less attractive people are less healthy so they'll not be good at problem solving which takes great genes. This is what most have concluded from Instagram photos of bodybuilders/athletes/celebrities.
I am guilty of this myself, I've dated many beautiful ladies who i chased with passion. They all had invested lot of money into their looks. They always complained about not being well off like me but now you know why.This is what attracted me to them. Face is the first thing i notice, i was young and naive and got fooled by clever makeup. So why you can't do same as a man? Hack your way to success.
If you are a good programmer and still not getting paid well or getting promoted faster, then it's probably this.
Here comes the twist. We finally figured out it has to do with their appearance. No one gives this as reason to you, they simply reject you period.
So we got a writer and analyst, to figure out what the market truly wants then created a script and we gave it to the programmers to memorize.
Add some professional make-up artists, took some photographs at a studio with many others (pretending to be at some event of great importance). This went straight to their Instagram account.
And 16 out of 20 programmer friends showed up for interview and got a successful placement.
But still 4 of them didn't find job yet.
What is this? This is new normal and this is what people who are interviewing and recruiting want.
This is a joke right? I would have thought development would be the one sector unaffected by look / image etc.
Unless you're interviewing for some hipster startup.
I know this guy who used to screen models at a Hollywood studio. Now he works as a recruiter in a tech company (he met a VP at stripclub who got him in), what do you think he does?
They are still same people! They look for same signals. They give it weird names like vibes / cultural fit or whatever.
Truth is, it's not developers that are hiring you. It's the regular folks.
Instagram has little to do with that; the two-way association between perceived health and attractiveness is deeply ingrained (the exact extent to which it is a very ancient feature of culture vs. an evolved biological trait independent of culture, I don't know, but it's one or both of those things.)
See a professional makeup artist and see how he can improve your attractivness without improving your health.
Go to interviews/dates/event with and without professional makeup and compare your success rate.
And they were reading from a script rather than responding to questions?
Are you sure this actually happened? To be honest this sounds like some kind of fantasy.
Makeup hides your unhealthy lifestyles. Baggy eyes from working all night look the same as baggy eyes from staying out in bars or gaming all night. It can also hides defects such as acne and bad skin tone that make you look younger or make give out the perception that you are or sick. Remember that they are hiring someone to be part of a team, so you are expected to look the part.
As for the script you had them learn and read... I'm confused... Did those people improvise their last interview on the spot? You should always be ready during an interview. You should have been rehearsing your speech so that you are able to deliver it in an eloquent way. Every answers to the typical interview questions should be aced. Programming is a team effort and communication is the key. Nobody wants to hire that loner who is unable to talk about himself for 10 minutes because how would this person be able to vulgarize a problem to the client or other department?
This is something that really irks me with the programming community. People tend to think that because we are geeky and outcasts we should get hired without putting any social effort. Social skills are just like any regular skills. You need to read books, follow tutorials and train them. Otherwise you look like a skilless individual and nobody wants to hire that.
“The Cosmetic Class”
“What happens when a society with a penchant for the cosmetic meets a medium dominated by it?”
I wish every article came with an abstract and conclusion like a scientific paper. Generally that's enough and you don't even need to read the middle.
I've seen one news source do that, by putting a bullet-point summary at the beginning of the article. Sadly, I don't remember which one was that (I don't usually pay attention to who is writing, when an article lands on HN). Most others prefer to do the inverse - bait you with the headline, make the beginning confusing, and only later on reveal the important details.
--
[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pyramid_(journalism)
You can tell from the first few sentences or paragraphs whether an article is worth reading. If you're not interested you stop reading it!
Movies and movie conventions. Baseball cards and other popular collectibles. Sport events. Music events. All those things are just "corporate pseudo-cultural productions". Yet they're also the culture, because - for better or worse - commerce is part of our lives too.
And I am saying it is enormously productive and beneficial to be skeptical of those things.
Here, I rewound the comment 25 years for you.
The author captures the essence of the vapid absurdism permeating social media, and our culture more broadly.
Nethercutt, whether he knows it or not, is the latter.
(There are people who can do both. Wendell Berry comes to mind. His essays have been compared to "fine whiskey for the mind.")