However it has a long history of publishing sensationalist articles especially about Tesla. I remember the articles about executives stepping away, NTSB probes, yellow lines, bankruptcy ... The recent article by Dan on how good Model 3 is is the only positive article I remember on WSJ about Tesla.
Do you remember any of them being factually incorrect?
You are implying bias, where I see a troubled company.
Can you name another instance where the WSJ wrote negatively about a company and it turned out to be false? As a subscriber, why the sudden skepticism?
[0] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-spy-satellite-believed-lost...
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/probes-point-to-northrop-grumma...
It is possible to be extremely biased against an entity that has real issues, just like a paranoid can have real enemies.
Apple would never have survived if they had not been run so conservatively, which speaks to the efforts of people other than Jobs and Gates.
At the end of 1997 their 10-K says they had around $1.4B dollars in cash, and around $900M in long term debt.
The 2000 10-K shows they had $4 billion in cash and short term investments compared to $300 million in long term debt.