How is this different from Rembrandt slapping is name on his apprentice’s work?
And a modern artist told his technician how to do his work.
In this sense, I think the boundary is much more fluent. In my personal opinion, the artist is the person who has the "most established name" to sell the piece of art that he branded under his name to rich people.
So your suggestion, of course refined gallantly in a way that makes it presentable in polite society, does not sound that absurd to me.