Everything else that follows is based off of your choice to use Android.
There are consequences to your choices. You don't have a line-item veto, after the fact, on contract terms.
If you want Google to stop open sourcing Android, this is how you do it.
Then you will lose the choice to have Android at all, unless Google is the provider, possibly with Samsung or Jolla as the OEM.
The law is currently written that a competitor, who gets twice as much revenue in their app store, and has far stricter controls, is not in trouble.
That's moronic.
"And what about Google choosing anti-competitive (i.e. Illegal) business model?" I think the law should be re-written so its not illegal, or what Google's competitors are doing should also be considered illegal.
I made both of those points abundantly clear. Yes, I did answer their question.
The business model is not illegal but it is if abused to leverage market position against the competition.
Apple doesn't have a large market nor do they leverage their market position to force potential competition out of said market.