Reminds me of the one account of an essay question grading program's unique flaw where it scored higher with every mention of orangutans with no regard to relevance or possibily even grammar.
Reminds me of the one account of an essay question grading program's unique flaw where it scored higher with every mention of orangutans with no regard to relevance or possibily even grammar.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/mortarboard/2013/may/2...
I guess orangutan is a sufficiently long word that replacing most nouns with it would improve your score.
Ran it across your comment with these results:
Sentiment Analysis: This text is: positive (+0.5)
funnyregardedcrashespolitewonderoverwhelminglyhorrifyingrudepositiveenjoyflawregard The full range of sentiments in this text is: positive 0.25, trust 0.178571428571429, surprise 0.142857142857143, anticipation 0.107142857142857, joy 0.107142857142857, sadness 0.0714285714285714, negative 0.0714285714285714, fear 0.0357142857142857, anger 0, disgust 0,
We’ve got the only librarian who can rip off your arm with his leg. People respect that.