Hunting the Con Queen of Hollywood
hollywoodreporter.com
hollywoodreporter.com
I wonder if is definitely a single voice impersonator or a deep-voice application. I don't hear any glitches and you'd have to have a lot of voice samples and confidence there wouldn't be glitches during the conversation.
Also probably a single impersonator, because if they were successful with synthetic simulation they probably wouldn't stick to impersonating just one gender.
Technology can't do that yet.
Claims are from seconds to 20 minutes of the original speaker's voice to creat a model that can be made to say anything:
https://www.theverge.com/2017/4/24/15406882/ai-voice-synthes...
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/3k7mgn/baidu-deep...
https://www.npr.org/2017/05/05/527013820/new-software-can-mi...
Definitely artifact-y with less source material, but it is very possible.
https://motherboard.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/qv34zb/how-i-...
The second British one definitely not. That accent was much better than the first. Incredibly talented scam artist.
So it seems Google/Alphabet finally found how to monetize their new robocaller!
Do people working in Hollywood or documentaries usually hand over sums of cash to anonymous guys on mopeds?