“Intensely terrible” is one way to phrase “illegal under the ADA”...
I would assume there will be accommodations made for folks with dietary restrictions that require them to eat meat, whether that’s through a simple waiver or a massive lawsuit.
I would assume there will be accommodations made for folks with dietary restrictions that require them to eat meat, whether that’s through a simple waiver or a massive lawsuit.
I wouldn't be so sure.
> They don't have an obligation to reimburse
They don't have an obligation to hire people, either, but if hiring doesn't make reasonable accommodations for disability, it's still illegal.
For what it’s worth, I’m a vegetarian and broadly in support of this policy, assuming it can be made compliant with the law.