I think in the future we'll see their AI fighting against our AI in an arms race similar to the spam wars. The one with the most computing power and biggest dataset will win and humans will be at their mercy.
I think in the future we'll see their AI fighting against our AI in an arms race similar to the spam wars. The one with the most computing power and biggest dataset will win and humans will be at their mercy.
Sounds like GAN in meatspace.
But quite possibly "greater efficiency" according to a fitness function that's not accurately mapped onto "keeping humans alive"...
I wonder if this'll end up in an equivalent state to the "tank detection neural net" which learned with 100% accuracy that the researchers/trainers had always taken pictures of tanks on cloudy days and pictures without tanks on sunny days? ( https://www.jefftk.com/p/detecting-tanks )
Who'd bet against the doctor/insurer neural net training ending up approving all procedures where, say, the doctor ends up with a kickback from a drug company - instead of optimising for maximum human health benefit?
Since when was this ever the case? Especially in America? The US healthcare system is NOT built around providing adequate care for everyone, as far as I've read/heard.
Full disclosure: West-EU citizen here
It was always like this. In my opinion it doesn't make a difference if some guy is more intelligent and is therefore able to suppress others or if he uses an AI that is more intelligent. For me the result is the same: I get rekt.
Google/Apple shuttle buses are being shot up with pellet guns today, imagine what happens when big AI corps openly work against population. Google AI/Amazon Rekognition protests suggest at least some employees have a shred of self awareness and survival Instinct.
No deep learning though.