Aren't we past the idea that "ability to instruct a computer and/or runtime via a programming language" comes with a preconceived set of personality traits? Chester describes a certain kind of programmer well, but the idea all programmers conform to this behavior pattern (and, by extension, if you don't conform to the pattern then you're not a programmer) is silly.

Put another way, A lisp hacker, a java developer and a priest walk into a bar ...