Please note that I am not commenting on the politcal achievements or failings of Kohl, just at the fact that this photo does him a disservice.
Please note that I am not commenting on the politcal achievements or failings of Kohl, just at the fact that this photo does him a disservice.
On the article, the be fair, neither Kohl, Schröder, nor Merkel managed to fix the mess caused by the re-unification. Kohl, alongside Mitterand had the right feel and ambition for the EU that I'm so happy to live in. But, the problem with Kohl, Merkel and many other leaders, is not the scandals about illegal contributions (the CDU did this since it's founding). They miss the point to step back, some even fail to build up candidates for their succession. Looking back at Great Britain when Churchill lost the General Election right after the war, that's probably the best thing that could have happened to them and I wish the 1990 Bundestagswahl would have ended with the same message: "Thank you for your service, let's see what the other guys can do".
PS: Whenever someone claims Germany's current government will fall due to #mersee I just laugh: There's no alternative to Bundeskanzlerin Merkel in sight and if the stubborn bavarians finally just the opposition (where they have been mentally for the last years) the Green Party will replace them and business will continue as usual.
Here is a much better picture of him in the later days:
Helmut Kohl with two of his friends:
https://www.bz-berlin.de/artikel-archiv/welcher-berliner-erk...
A classic picture:
https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Artikel/2014_Deuts...
George H. Bush about Helmut Kohl:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnysQpIlP2g
What a contrast to today.
I found a startling continuity in electoral platforms of Kohl-Chirac-Sarco. They had one thing in common: they did not really had anything constituing a political platform. They all had slight populist tones in their campaigns, well every politician have these, but what was more important to note is that they really had nothing else besides very weak, generic, politically-amorphous "we will spend more on this, less on that la la la."
Basically, their message to the electorate was nothing more than their smiling faces on billboards, and a promise of "more free bacon after you elect me"
And this promise of "free bacon" was only getting more and more accepted.
And with time, Western political cultures degenerated to a point where anything, but a discourse of "what kind of free bacon you want this time" became irrelevant.
The moment this happened, the clique I call "ultrapopulists" rushed on to the forefront. I think that was well expected: if all buyers in a beer shop are pathologic alcoholics, it makes sense to just to sell the strongest, cheapest, unrefined booze you have. In other words: alcoholics do not come to a liquor store for a craft beer. And the same phenomenon is now happening in Western politics
None of those types made me feel that they have that "we are going there"
Nowadays politicians have very generic "liberal," "democratic," "socialist" action plans they give to the public, but you never sense that there is any "prevailing idea" or strategy formulation behind them. All of them can easily come out of random number generator.
... and this was frequently used in photos. Just Google for "Kohl Honecker" or "Kohl Putin" and you'll see what I mean.