Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by felix_nagaand | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

felix_nagaand

Citations needed

View on HN

work life balance: Men work longer hours

https://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/06/30/new-repo...

Women tend to choose more fulfilling lower paying careers (last point on fortune and second last on time)

http://fortune.com/2018/04/10/gender-pay-gap-myths/

http://time.com/5230911/equal-pay-day-2018-wage-gap-myths/

I don't have the original studies but I think the news sources here are fairly reliable

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

Perhaps you can find the citation yourself and use it to counter the point you are replying to.

I don't follow the connection between your link and your comment. The user you replied to was, themselves, replying to another user making appeals to expertise about what "the literature" says, without actually supplying that literature.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claims. What is freely asserted is freely dismissed. How would the user you replied to even go about searching for the citation, given so little information to go off of?

The link you provided seems to allude to someone announcing their personal preference, which should not have to be defended. Assertions of what scientific literature have established as accepted wisdom are free game for questioning. That's what gives theories their fundamental efficacy, being able to withstand reasonable criticism.

> What is freely asserted is freely dismissed.

Then kindly leave it at that. It is, after all, the nature of friendly and disagreeable conversation. Crying to me about it certainly isn't productive.

You made an assertion that someone was being unreasonable in their requests for citations. You projected some buzzword made up by a webcomic, and then tried to associate it with something else entirely, as if demanding citations is the province of mouth breathers. You then misinterpreted my reply in the worst possible light, to fit the conspiracy that supports your original points. And now you're playing the victim card yourself because you have no further merits to argue.

If simple enumeration of the fallacies contained your arguments is seen as a personal attack, You don't have a lot of ground to stand on when you accuse other people of being trolls.

I think the misunderstanding here is that a conversation is not a contest. There aren't combatants or winners. But, there certainly is potential for harassment, emotion, and aggression of which all are unnecessary.

If you want a citation then go find it. Don't expect other people to do YOUR work for YOU. For more information on trolling: https://github.com/prettydiff/wisdom/blob/troll/Avoiding_Tro...

Anybody who anticipates a conversation is a thing that can be won, as in a contest or battle, is probably a troll.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com