This article is extremely biased and poorly written. I'd prefer to read something coherent with a more neutral tone vs an angry one. Sucks for the 13 year old - a felony charge seems extreme.
To me it seems to represent the voice of reason (which, in this case should respond with incredulity and anger to the BS existence first, felony nature second, and application of law to a 13 year old, third -- and by a school official nonetheless).
I'd take something with an angrier tone, like an appeal to fire the school principle and ban him from teaching for life.
I agree with banning for life. This is absolutely insane. I really hope this case is just to point out how insane this actually is, but man.. That poor kid.
I agree with the ridiculous assertion, given that I’m to be ashamed and the top reply to my comment includes the line “I'd take something with an angrier tone, like an appeal to fire the school principle and ban him from teaching for life.”
It talkes a lot of us, working together for a long period of time to approach neutrality.
Today, on this short, for profit, news cycle, we have to use a lot of sources to get diverse bias and some reasonable grasp on scenarios.