Hacker News Reader

Comment by invisible | Hacker News Reader

So Jason was getting 30-50% of a conference that made ~5m to 6m with TechCrunch's branding and Jason is surprised when Arrington feels like maybe he is the one getting screwed? I think maybe TechCrunch's name has a bit better branding than Mahalo...

Arrington is running a business - a startup - and he has every right to run his own conference using his brand. (Well, I guess AOL's brand now.)

View on HN

Disclaimer: I'm just speculating

Mike Arrington presumably wanted to reduce Jason Calacanis' stake because most of the revenue was coming from TC50 and AOL didn't want to buy them with Calacanis getting half the revenue. So Arrington, acting in his own self-interest as one would expect, sacrificed his business relationship with Calacanis in order to make TechCrunch more attractive for an acquirer. These diverging interests led to their fallout and understandably made Calacanis irate. Though, I suspect that Calacanis would have done the same thing if the situation was reversed.

I think it was clear when Arrington stormed off stage last year that they were not going to work together again.

I don't know much about this stuff, but the 'sacrifice business relationship with Calacanis', is that the only loss Arrington had? Seems like a tiny thing to lose. Leaving Arrington's persona out, Calacanis is a major douche from what I've seen so really it doesn't seem like Arrington lost anything from switching to Disrupt.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com