Hacker News Reader

Comment by Grue3 | Hacker News Reader

Anything that isn't used to produce some sort of official documents should be using Western-style dates anyway. Also month, day and time stay the same regardless of the era. Only the year number gets reset to 1.

View on HN

”Western-style“ dates don’t really exist: most countries use DMY, US for reasons unknown has gone with MDY, and Japan and China have officially standardised on ISO-8601 (YMD): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country

A Western-style date refers to a date based on the Gregorian calendar, regardless of how one orders the individual components of a date.

I suspect "Western-style dates" was meant to refer to the Gregorian calendar rather than the format used to represent a date on that calendar.

ISO-8601 only really applies to the Gregorian calendar.

YMD is the only sane format. When you sort, you can sort by the year, followed by month and day. I do this a lot with folder names or log file names in directories, file system creation/modified dates don't always match reality. e.g. a folder named 2018-01-07 is entirely readable to anyone who looks at it, but at the same time easily sorted.

And DMY is the only sane human-readable format for LTR languages.

When you write the time, do you put the minutes to the left or the right of the hour?

I think that the timescale on which humans live matters here. The year field doesn't change often, so for the everyday usecase it's kind of redundant – it's probably the current year, so specifying it first is kind of noisy[1]. But on the scale of hours, it's the minutes that are noise, because you likely care more about the hour. So I guess the most ergonomic ordering depends on the usecase.

[1] This could be different if you're, say, browsing an archive. Still, if I'm looking at a thread from 2005, that context is in my head, and I don't need to be constantly reminded of that by seeing 2005-XX-YY.

In English, at least, it used to be that a document such as a letter would begin with a date indicating when it was written, and then for dates ±1 month from that date would express relatively, like so:

* "The 10th instant" / "10th inst." = tenth day of current month indicated in date of document

* "The 10th ultimo" / "10th ult." = tenth day of month preceding the one indicated in date of document

* "The 10th proximo" / "10th prox." = tenth day of month following the one indicated in date of document

Arabic often writes dates and phone numbers from left to right. I can't speak for other RTL langauges but I can't see DMY being a problem for most people around the world. Ultimately, non-English speakers have to learn English to write code and if they want standardised dates across their systems they should use the standard of the language they're writing in.

Okay, there's what the date _is_ (on what calendar, what system of reckoning dates?), and there's how you serialize it.

(month: July; day-of-month: 2; year: 2018) -- can be serialized (written) a variety of ways, ISO-8601 Y-M-D being one of them.

However (month: July; day-of-month: 2; year: Heisei 30) is a different story, not just a question of serialization.

(month: Tamus; day-of-month: 19; year: 5778) -- yet more different.

(month: Shawwal; day-of-month: 18; year:1439)

"Western style dates" above means "the Gregorian calendar". Yes, how you write or serialize it for machine-parsing can be another issue. But dates on _another calendar altogether_ is a bigger one. Although the Japanese calendar that just has a different name for the year, but the months and dates and beginning and ends of the year are synchornized with gregorian -- not as big as the "Hebrew" or "Islamic" calendars which have entirely different months and years with boundaries unrelated to the gregorian calendars'.

"Western-style dates" is a literal translation of "西暦(seireki)", which people use to refer to the Gregorian calendar in Japanese.

Thanks, that adds the necessary context.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com