EDIT: Although, I bet that scooping up the founders would have made it worth it, though their willingness to sell for $750k makes me wonder if they were the visionaries then that they appear to be now.
EDIT: Although, I bet that scooping up the founders would have made it worth it, though their willingness to sell for $750k makes me wonder if they were the visionaries then that they appear to be now.
Reminds me of a friend of mine when we were younger. When asked what he did, he replied, "I'm a rock start. But nobody knows it yet".
Anyway, From the day Google hit the market, and their searches actually returning something even remotely close to what you where looking for seemed like voodoo. Google exceeded the "remotely" part by usually hitting the nail on the head. Given the fact that their algorithm was not known it was not being manipulated like people try to do today. Search results where actually better back then then they are today.
Anyway to get to the point, I don't think there where too many people that thought Google was going to be anything short of "the" search engine. At lest those at the grassroot level.
I think this is the case of a executive dismissing the technical merit of a competitors product, when the other offerings where so abominable that technical merit counted.
When things are close you can win out on branding but this was a case of the buggy companies not seeing the horseless carriage decimating their market while the guy on the street could see the advantage of the new offering clearly.
If that was the case, someone would have snatched them up, especially given the ridiculous valuations companies were getting in 1999.
While stocks where still climbing into 2000, I remember venture money becoming very scare in 99. In mid 99 there was a brief downturn and then stock rallied to astronomical levels through the end of 99 into 2000. I remember that brief blip as serving as a writing on the wall that the party was almost over. Things tightened up at a lot of places right after that event.
So while valuations where up, acquisitions and new ventures where down significantly. That was an strange time to be in the industry, because it seemed like everyone knew it was coming, but no one wanted to dare utter it.
and when gmail first came and was invite only, it made me resent google even more, they felt snobish!
a long time later i started to like them and ironically, its gmail quality that made me a believer in google
google make most of their money from ads, only time will show how long will they go, not that it matters much, because i believe you dont have to be successful for ever, becoming no 10 after you were no 1 for 20 or so years is ....
well, we can talk about it, but they lived it!
Many of the startup entrepreneurs I know spend an unfortunate amount of emotional energy beating up on themselves for not having created Facebook/Twitter/name-your-favorite-uber-success-story here.
It's good to be regularly reminded that smarts and incredible work ethic are necessary but not sufficient for that kind of epic-level startup success.
Or perhaps they had more than one idea, and selling a preliminary collection of search algorithms to reduce personal financial pressure made sense to them given the high-risk nature of the market they were playing in.