Hacker News Reader

Comment by stefco_ | Hacker News Reader

Note that the whole assembly rotates when in wheel mode. Making it radially symmetric (i.e. a triangle) in track mode means that it can switch modes with at most a 120 degree rotation rather than having to rotate through up to 360 degrees to get the flat bottom into position.

View on HN

I didn't say anything about the design of it, which is by the way, very cool. I don't understand the point of the triangle. The same mechanism could be used to change the geometry of the wheel only at the bottom.

I would guess that it has to do with the tread tension. A rounded top with a flat bottom may leave the tread too loose. The triangle keeps it taught.

Note: taut (pulled tightly) and taught (past tense of teach) are homophones

Considering that this is a rather a rounded triangle, I doubt it has anything to do with tightness, and more with convenience, esthetic. A symmetrical displacement is also slightly less constraining in term of keeping the overall circumference/periphery (i.e. less deformation).

A better design would have been to flatten the wheel into an more oblong or even an egg shape, like snowmobiles or tanks have. However, it requires more mechanical displacement and adjustements.

"Better" is meaningless in isolation. The design you propose is better in some aspects, but likely not in the areas the designers of this wheel are optimizing for (simplicity, reliability, etc)

I suspect it may apply torque from the drivetrain to the mechanism with the most optimal geometric leverage against both the mechanisms internal frame and the contact patch on the ground during transition into and out of tread mode.

Changing it only at the bottom adds complexity: Which side is at the bottom right now? How can we know this; how can we know this in a way that will survive the tough conditions we expect this to be driven in? And then we need to have three separate actuator paths to transform just one part of the wheel.

We would also need to deal with the fact that just flattening one side of the wheel would make for a shorter perimeter than that of the circle; the tread is a loop of a constant length, and it needs to be kept fairly taut to function in both wheel and tread mode.

The triangle solution absolutely does need to keep track of which side is at the bottom, or you'll end up with all the weight on one vertice.

Agree with the perimeter consideration.

It's a symmetrical wheel -- there is no bottom.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com