Australian footage of Neil Armstrong's moon walk
news.yahoo.com
news.yahoo.com
It is both amazing and understandable.
Which ones? I'm trying to read more of his stuff, so far it's been hit or miss.
Anyone got any other recommendations? I've really enjoyed his scifi but not so hot on demons (they were fun, but not as interesting I don't think)
Also, it's "Rainbows End", no apostrophe. Oddly, I found this book a bit retro in its application of tech.
Indeed, shamefully my fingers auto-corrected.
In this same vein, here are some other old and NASA media- and hardware-related materials that may be of interest:
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/22/nation/na-lunar22
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1066370...
Two things I recall, apart from the stunning images: * This was all done in analogue of course; the camera of the lunar orbiter had a 24" aperture from memory, and essentially a mechanical film processing lab onboard (then stitched back on earth by manual layout and re-photographing). "They knew how to build stuff back then!"
* As you said, he was emphasising that while data formats are important, the hardware is even more crucial. For the tapes they were recovering, there were only 4 machines left in the world that could read them... and only one human who knew how they worked and could repair them! I went and started reading up on the long-now project after that.
* Bonus recollection: the reason the tapes hadn't degraded and lost their magnetic material, like many others their age, was because the binding agent used was... whale oil.
Actually, I've found the slides: http://www.slideshare.net/kcowing/presentation-by-dennis-win...
Thanks so much for the reminder.