Besides the fact that the ribbon and menu structures are completely different, I find myself screaming at my mac on a daily basis "What the fuck do you think the 'C' in CSV stands for? I'll give you one hint, Excel for Mac: it doesn't stand for 'Semicolon'!"
Still better than Numbers for Mac, though.
It’s such an atrociously coded POS, and I say this as someone who spent a significant amount of time reverse engineering it. The performance of basic actions, like opening the app, is abysmal and unnecessarily resource intensive. It’s infuriating that a public company with a massive valuation cannot produce better engineered software than the Snapchat app.
I also have trouble understanding the thought process behind their latest UI revamp, specifically merging stories and chats into the same screen. It’s so user hostile and was met with such hatred, I’m surprised they haven’t rolled it back. Fundamental UI changes to mature products are dangerous, and often the negative effects of the changes don’t manifest themselves for 6-12 months after introducing them, at which point it’s too late.
FWIW I hardly ever use Snapchat now (less than once a day) though I never used it much anyway. It also seems like far fewer of my friends are posting stories on Snapchat, and far more are posting them on Instagram.
Uuuugh.
At one point, there was a popup with a link to a page that you cant get to via the menu system, so had to type that URL from a screenshot someone luckily took. There is a weird program for configuring some parts of it where you have to paste bits of XML into boxes with no confirmation you did it right, other than something else not working later on. Oh yuck.
This is worst from a UX perspective. I am making no remarks on the underlying tech which is quite useful for us.
Second worst is google sites.
"Lets make things as unintuitive as possible, people will love the "unique" vibe." - Hulu probably
What don't you like about WordPress? It's not perfect but as far as content management systems go I'd say it fares pretty well, especially when compared with alternatives such as TYPO3 (which is very powerful but also an utter usability nightmare).
[1] this one isn't really Python's fault, it's arguably a feature of Python having a relatively low barrier of entry for people to hack together valuable balls of technical debt.