The Garden of Earthly Delights by Jheronimus Bosch
tuinderlusten-jheronimusbosch.ntr.nl
tuinderlusten-jheronimusbosch.ntr.nl
(Also, visual art is not something that I used to enjoy for the majority of my life and I still know next to nothing of art but I just found his work spellbinding)
Picasso is great, but in a very 20th C way, a lot of what carries his work is a feeling of his energy and charisma, rather than depth of technique of concept. In contrast someone like Bosch was creating these very intensely realised fantasy scenes. Picasso couldn't have done that if he tried, nor can any movie concept artist working today. The same goes for any of the old masters. It's gone, somehow...
Like I say, this is opinion, but as in architecture, where there is definitely no good classical building happening today, there is no credible 'old master" painting happening now. Even the whole category of figurative art is in question in the same way that ornament in architecture is effectively dead. There are still people who can carve classical architectural ornament but as a creative tradition, it's over.
I'd reiterate that the division of labour and the role of the artist means there isn't really any access to the "old master" position any more. Being an artist since about 1900 has been about ego/charisma, a largely self-selected group rather than talents discovered in obscurity and then elevated to greatness by patrons. The art business is structurally similar to how it was, in the sense that it still runs on patronage and prestige, but there is some kind of crisis in the formation of artists. Probably part of a wider loss of cultural direction and the general fact that there is now too much to know about the world and everything (paintings, careers) feels rushed. You still see flashes of intriguing visual ideas, sensitivity to colour, new combinations of different forms of art, but I don't think anyone would claim that even the best of today's art can compete with that from before modernisation took hold. It's a state of disenchantment that we can't wish away by going back to the old techniques.
Today art as a profession is the job of selling the person and the story. Real talent is often found in industrial design and advertising where the work is still more important than who made it.
Along with Ernst Fuchs and Dali, I would place H. R. Giger in that line - not in terms of specific technique, but "the skills and ways of looking" of an artist, if not a master.. That's a mere trickle though, and certainly not a tradition anymore, just individual exceptions. I agree with your point that "Painting has deteriorated since the old masters."
It rings true about the "crisis in the formation of artists", that in modern times, something essential has been lost in what it means to be an artist. The wider loss of cultural direction, the disenchantment - I wonder whether it's related to the loss of mythology and religion.
Only snag is that you can easily spend half an hour going over the details of a single painting, and viewer lines have to keep moving. Probably the optimal number of Bosch paintings in a museum is 1 ;-)
The books (e.g. Hieronymus Bosch, The Complete Works by Stefan Fischer) have trouble showing both the whole picture (too small) and the details (too fragmentary).
A few questions to anyone who can shed more light:
1. What would be the likely dimensions of the source image in pixels to reach such a zoomed level of detail?
2. What kind of camera equipment would I need to photograph such an image of similar size? Can I get away with a run of the mill DSLR such as Nikon D3400/D7500 or Canon EOS 80D?
3. What kind of lens is suitable? Macro?
4. What would be the process of photographing such an image? Taking a single high-res image or taking a series of high-res macro images under suitable lighting and stitching them together?
5. What would be the tools to host the image that would allow this kind of interactivity?
I have a project in mind that could make use of the same technology.
edit: in this video, at 0:25 you can see the setup presumably used. https://vimeo.com/ondemand/jheronimusbosch/146311294
- take multiple zoomed-in low DOF overlapping photos, with fixed settings, covering the artwork from a tripod, only rotating the camera
- stitch with Hugin[1] and export undistorted UHD photo
- split the it into tiles according to your viewer's format with ImageMagick
- view with a tile viewer. OpenSeaDragon[2] is smooth and well suited for UHD images, but any can be adapted/used, for example leaflet[3].
Would love to hear about other workflows !
The Bosch websites seems to use Micrio[4] for the UHD viewing and storytelling.
[1] http://hugin.sourceforge.net/
[2] https://openseadragon.github.io/
[4] https://micr.io/
See also [2] for an intriguing piece on possible gnostic symbolism in this painting.
1: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/08/18/mystery-of-hieron...
I'm not sure if Dave's been active recently but he's best known for the use of his paintings as album covers for seminal UK doom metal band Cathedral.
I was fortunate enough to meet Dave in 2005 and purchase one his paintings. Chatting with him he confirmed my suspicion that he was heavily influenced by Bosch.
Did you notice that the background music changes depending on where you zoom in on the image?