Apple’s Next Laptops Could Be More iPhone Than Mac
wsj.com
wsj.com
Disclaimer: my current laptop still has an ESC key also I used to work for Apple
I love my Mac. I do. But, every new release is a little more locked down and a little more proprietary. Gatekeeper and code signing keep getting nudged a little closer to mandatory. For example, if you build your own GDB, you can't use it to debug without going through steps to sign it. dtrace no longer works correctly without additional steps. OpenGL has now been deprecated.
I love my Mac. I've been using them since the original Mac 128k. But, I feel like the writing's on the wall, and in ten to twenty years, the Mac will be a locked down platform like iOS. I hope I'm wrong, but... I've been getting comfortable with Linux on the desktop, in case I'm not.
[1] https://duckduckgo.com/?q=apple+broken+cable&t=ffab&iax=imag...
I'd like to see steady updates too, but perhaps we should all admit that updates aren't as essential as they used to be.
The 12” MacBook provides most of the functionality I want at three times the price. I can’t (for example) plug it in to power and storage at the same time without spending even more money on USB-C infrastructure.
So basically, you're agreeing with me: you're continuing to use an old product because it still meets your needs. You'd prefer that it had better specs, but not so much that you're willing to switch to anything else.
There was a time (not so long ago) that using an 8-year-old laptop would be unthinkable. Now it's maybe kind of an annoyance. That's my point.
I have resorted to carrying a wallet full of SD cards, swapping those out, then doing a bulk import when I get back to hotel/home/camp. The use case for the MBA (photo culling while having a coffee break or while travelling) is no longer possible for me.
I would love an incremental update to the MBA which just gave me more SSD, more RAM, a faster processor without tripling the price.
It is not that the old product still meets my needs, so much as there is no equivalent product in the new range.
"No innovation on the desktop" doesn't really mean anything. Who else is "innovating on the desktop" right now?
"Getting rid of ports" can also be interpreted as "moving to new and superior ports". Apple has always been brutal in weeding out obsolete interfaces and introducing new ones.
Trackpad - Finally enough people are coming out and said the amount of false positive on its extremely large trackpad is driving them insane. Yes, even 1% false positive is crap. You don't want to have your trackpad disrupt your workflow few times a day when you are typing.
The USB-C / Thunderbolt bolt frying peripherals with high voltage.
There was a comment below about people are using 5-6 years ago hardware because it is good enough and hardware update are no longer important. That is like so far from truth.
These people wanted an upgrade, but there is absolutely nothing in the product line they could upgrade into. You bought a Mac mini and want something faster, may be with SSD at least? No, not unless you move to iMac. I mean heck even iMac still ships with HDD in 2018. MacBook Air upgrade without the crappy keyboard, the current Air doesn't offer any upgrade and its Screen is still crap. A TN FHD screen, doesn't even have to be retina, cost less then $10 more in BOM cost.
We can, in the old days try hard to spin whatever Apple has pumped out are Great in one sense or another. Now they are not, they don't care about it enough. The attention to details is no longer there, and they are still charging a lot for it.
I recently had to switch from Ubuntu to a Mac when switching jobs and it feels like everyone is using iTerm2 instead of stock.
For me (coming from Ubuntu) having cmd/ctrl switched for most default keybindings, but not for terminal signals (ctr-c and ctrl-d for cancel/terminate) and no middle-click copy are huge painpoints when working with any terminal in mac.
But yea, I wish linux distros had something like iTerm. Guake/ Terminator/ whatever just aren't as good.
They are steadily paring away all of their target demographics until only users who are seeking a status symbol are left. I wonder how that will work out for them.
Intel said nothing of the sort, in large part because their upcoming process is called "10nm".
ios is still to limited when it comes to usb storage but when that is "fixed" i belive 80% of all computer users could be satisfied with IOS.
Neglecting the fact that users want torrent software and the likes.
From this I guess they are guessing this based on the fact that Apple have been slow to update their laptops recently?
So one day soon Apple are going to come out with new computers that are a radical departure from the past, the x86 gone and their own chips powering the next generation of MacBooks?
Sounds great but in the same timescale Google are going to bring out something that is an Operating System but not as we know it, with A.I. baked in. Should be interesting times.
Downvoting you for being helpful is a bit uncharitable, +1