Apple Maps has been down for hours, users unable to search for places/directions
9to5mac.com
9to5mac.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontchartrain_Expressway#cite_...
The restaurant I was going to is above one of several tunnels under the city which hold I-35. Apple Maps assumed this meant the restaurant was actually on the shoulder of the interstate. Took me an extra 15 minutes to backtrack and get there on the correct surface roads. Immediately switched back to Google/Here
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pickwick+Restaurant+%26+Pu...
"You have arrived!".
-- Apple autonomous car, inside the tunnel.
With that said, you can always help out when you find quirks like this by reporting them. I went ahead and made a report for this particular problem, so it should hopefully get fixed shortly.
Try reporting it again. Sounds like your first report simply got lost somehow. I think every issue I've ever reported has gotten fixed, so it's not like they're habitually ignoring reports.
There has yet to be a time that Google Maps failed to get me within a couple of lots of my destination while Apple Maps has been off by more than a mile multiple times.
It makes using Uber or any other google maps-based app particularly irritating and as-yes there is no fix after almost a year of reports.
Open Street Maps works perfectly well, as does apple.
- One can't even search "Point A to Point B" and get a result.
- When driving, it always seems to lag behind me, barely giving any time to make a turn.
It has been years and they have plenty of resources to be competitive. The whole product just feels like it was designed by someone who is driven to work on a tech bus.
That's funny because you could say that about google, bing, or apple maps. And Probably true for at least 2 of those.
For a new incumbent to surpass it takes more than being just as good
Reliability?
It's pretty good in most places and straight up terrible in others. Google maps tends to have higher lows even though there definitely are cases when Apple's highs are actually higher. But you have to remember: users are using this for going to new places. They don't know they're getting the lowest of the low quality results until it's too late. After a few times getting burned, most people just give up on it which means their most recent impression of it is probably post-failure where-the-fuck-am-I panic.
>What would it take for that impression to go away?
Raise those lows up. I almost think it'd be better for it actually give up and say "I don't know" instead of possibly routing users incorrectly. Users will still think it sucks but they won't be stressed out about the sucky-ness and might be willing to try it again later. From my experience, Siri is a good example of this. It's probably the worst "assistant" out there but it's pretty good about knowing when to give up so users can just Google something.
IIRC Apple has their own wardriving database which makes the WiFi-based location services work, it's possible that was flushed and not refreshed from their services.
(My parent was almost certainly incorrect. Having wifi off has always made location pretty bad on iPhones.)
Doing this for enough services also might be a way to lower energy consumption (?) and mobile bills.