Maybe not, but a lot of top-tier institutions follow very similar admission policies and so an individual is at the risk of being excluded from all of them solely because of their race. Let's say if this suit against Harvard is successful, it will establish precedent and other institutions will be forced re-examine and amend their admission policies.
For one thing, UC's and CalTech don't.
And even if they were, my resounding response is.... so? Has society regressed to the point where if you don't go to an elite private institution (i.e. not your flagship public university) you will never achieve anything? If the true problem is a lack of social upward mobility, I feel that's a bigger problem than worrying about who gets to win the lottery.
I say this as someone who got into the other school targeted by the group (UNC, I didn't go) while also being Asian and overall very mediocre.
https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/expose/book/cloak-meritocrac...
It’s a hard political problem (both the discriminated against and the ones benefitting from the quota have a valid argument). Obvs an unbiased solution would be to admit the best, regardless, but for social reasons, it may not be optimal.
If this was truly the intention they are doing a very poor job of it. Class of 2021 is 22.2% Asian-American according to their website.
They lost access to a world-class education, professional network, and maybe >$1million in lifetime income premium over their alternate life path.
That's a totally legitimate viewpoint that I could be sympathetic to. But I also keep hearing that your undergrad degree doesn't matter - often by the same people that complain about AA after I mention I go to a state school. Now which is it?