Hacker News Reader

> Amazon can't throw a $50 million peanut at the epidemic of homelessness ravaging their hometown

This is an unfair framing. The tax did far more damage than impair Amazon's bottom line. Your complaint, moreover, could be leveled against every public service in the city. There are simply better ways to solve this problem. Seattle's government chose pot shots over progress.

View on HN

Sure there are simply better ways, there are always better ways, and those better ways will be likewise crushed by the muscle at Amazon who make sure the company can extract as much value out of Seattle without having to pay its fair share in taxes.

> those better ways will be likewise crushed by the muscle at Amazon

This tax was predominantly opposed by small business owners. (I think it was $25,000 donated by Amazon and close to $300,000 by small businesses.)

The proposed tax was a flat payroll tax. That burdens lower-wage employees and employers much more than tech companies. There is perfect being the enemy of good, and then there is cutting off the nose to spite the face. This was the latter.

> The tax did far more damage than impair Amazon's bottom line

It really didn't though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com